This is JMartin's TypePad Profile.
Join TypePad and start following JMartin's activity
Join Now!
Already a member? Sign In
JMartin
Recent Activity
Whether private industry should fund it or not, the Government has been subsidizing industry and research since the Lincoln administration, at least -- Transcontinental Railroad (where most of the companies eventually went bankrupt, by the way), and Land Grant Universities. The latter made it possible for west Texas to produce cotton to send to China where it goes into the clothes we buy cheaper than it can be grown in Africa where labor is less expensive. Research to promote industry and jobs.
HarveyD, The end user for much energy is already using electricity. If that can be produced cheaper (or with less financial risk) than by coal and natural gas, it will. The auto consumer will buy electric when BEVs are cheap, and they have seen that they work. The latter is happening faster than the former.
HarveyD, High Voltage Direct Current.
We will see more such announcements in the future. The uncertain regulation excuse is only partly legitimate. The real reason is the unwillingness to commit huge sums to produce expensive oil in the face of fast changing energy technology -- wind, solar, bio -- and conservation through more efficient use thereof. The risks of oil exploration and development are rising.
Why not just mandate a Bluetooth signal? Pedestrians would then be responsible for having a bluetooth device, and those with cell phones, iPods, etc. would still hear the signal. That would limit noise pollution from cars in the cities.
ToppaTom: The auto companies also had managers that signed contracts with those union workers, and also paid themselves plenty to run the companies in the ground. The shareholders elected boards that let them do it, and the banks loaned money to bad management. Everyone had a part to play.
A friend has a Ford Fusion Hybrid, and it came standard with a continuous fuel/mileage readout on the dash. If drivers can't learn how to drive economically from that, there is nothing that will help. My friend said his driving style changed within a week.
SJC: Where have you been the last 5 years? Paper mills are closing as newspapers and book publishers fade away -- because of the internet. iPads and iPhones are just accelerating the process.
Young drivers are no longer "drivers." They are texters, readers, talkers. There is no commitment to driving, and it is no longer fun. So let the machines drive so we can check the iPhone, or whatever.
Herm - When you put your straw in the ground and get oil to gush out free forever, be sure to let us know. Apparently Exxon does not know about this, as their output is down.
I am not opposed to nuclear energy, but you will never get private industry to risk its capital. It will only happen if the Government guarantees the loans. If we are going to do that, I would prefer to underwrite solar and wind, but would not oppose all three. I do oppose oil and coal subsidies and wars.
Yes, and if your EV runs after the storm, you can drive 20 miles to get a recharge where the electricity is still available, drive back and turn on your lights.
I won't drive 5-7 miles to fuel my car any time soon. And if a million people are refueling at the same station, it may get a little crowded, no matter how many mpg we get.
Sorry, polyurethanes, rather than polymers. My chemistry is not that great.
It will be interesting to see how quickly additive manufacturing takes off, and when it will hit the auto industry, not just for complex parts, but structure and panels. My guess is this will happen quickly. BASF and others have already shown they can produce cheaper, lighter, and more resilient wind turbine blades with carbon reinforced polymers. Now it is just a matter of the most efficient manufacturing method -- and testing.
The Antarctic Government?
@EP- They recognize the military/security logic. If the US did, both Republicans and Democrats would be clamoring for electric based energy independence. Instead, they vie to see who can spend the most on weapons systems. The new jet fighter is projected to cost over a $trillion. For that, we could make every bus in america EV or FC, and cover half the houses with PV.
How about a guaranteed market with a guaranteed price on a declining basis over time. Sort of like a feed-in tariff. Then let the private market lend money.
Our government is non-functional as a democracy. History has shown that governments survive as long as the masses allow them to -- democracy, dictatorship, or kingdom. When enough people are desperate enough, things will change -- maybe not for the better, those in power will no longer be in power. I hope we don't reach that point.
This technology, as it matures, it will bring manufacturing back to the US. That will not help China, but it will also not create jobs here. To the contrary, it will eliminate manufacturing jobs everywhere. Whether that is good or bad, it is reality.
@Davemart- I am not an engineer, so maybe I am missing something, but it looks to me like UQM is just one piece of the mechanical transportation puzzle. Why would they care where the electricity comes from -- fuel cell or battery? I do think this is an indication that vehicles of the future will be built more from interchangeable parts, much like PC's are today.
@Davemart: Try: http://www.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/MSD-full-spectrum-solar-cell.html http://www.futurity.org/science-technology/full-spectrum-boosts-solar-cell-power/ http://www.tgdaily.com/trendwatch-features/39807-new-solar-cell-material-achieves-almost-100-efficiency-could-solve-world-w None of them are commercial yet, but there is research.
Bayer also recently announce the use of polyurethane impregnated with carbon nanotubes for wind turbine blades. This may be among the "clever combination of fillers" referred to.
INVESTMENT! Energy produced in US means more money stays in US to be spent on other things -- economic multiplier effect. From an economic standpoint, it does not matter if it is oil or solar, just so it is produced here. I prefer solar, personally. And I don't mind my tax dollars helping to push the technology. They will come back to the US with better economy.