This is's Typepad Profile.
Join Typepad and start following's activity
Join Now!
Already a member? Sign In
Recent Activity
I find it troubling that Sontag wants to say that aesthetic response is moral to the extent that it is "enlivening". This is a vitalistic claim. This "enlivening" is surely an effect of the encounter with the work of art, something caused by it, something which happens to us, whereas the moral is linked closely to volition and judgment, to doing things. The taste of a strawberry might be enlivening, but that would hardly qualify it as moral. Her claim that sensibility "prompts our readiness to act" is given the lie gloriously by none other than Hamlet, who had sensibility to spare and nonetheless found action elusive. She wants to say that the aesthetic is necessarily defined by a certain type of experience, and this makes it moral, but experiences are not moral, actions are. I heard Sontag speak a couple of years before she died, and she spoke emphatically of the need for art to instruct. IIRC she used the phrase "lessons of the heart". This was surpising given her earlier positions. When I asked her to autograph my hardbound copy of Under the Sign of Saturn, she looked askance at me, almost like I had mentioned a youthful indiscretion, and told me to read her recent works as she signed my book.