This is me.yahoo.com/a/6haq8.Zh3NDYRXfDIMYB3V0W1x8qLxtN6Q--'s TypePad Profile.
Join TypePad and start following me.yahoo.com/a/6haq8.Zh3NDYRXfDIMYB3V0W1x8qLxtN6Q--'s activity
me.yahoo.com/a/6haq8.Zh3NDYRXfDIMYB3V0W1x8qLxtN6Q--
Recent Activity
The United States Supreme Court has already ruled that the courts should be made as fully accessible to the public as possible. Judges have always been allowed to control actions and conduct in their own courtrooms. So why do they feel they are not bound by their own rulings?
Commented Sep 1, 2010 on In Canada's Supreme Court, Cameras are No Big Deal at The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times
In Canada's Supreme Court, Cameras are No Big Deal
U.S. Supreme Court justices still talk about television cameras as if they were deeply mysterious, brain-draining devices not to be approached with anything shorter than a 40-foot pole. But in Canada's Supreme Court, where proceedings have been broadcast for more than 20 years, cameras are just ...
me.yahoo.com/a/6haq8.Zh3NDYRXfDIMYB3V0W1x8qLxtN6Q-- is now following The Typepad Team
Sep 1, 2010
Subscribe to me.yahoo.com/a/6haq8.Zh3NDYRXfDIMYB3V0W1x8qLxtN6Q--’s Recent Activity
