I would be very interested in learning the lineage of modern filmstocks and developer histories. there's still a small universe of B&W films and developers available, and considering the mix & match combinations, there's a lot of room for experimentation. the Adams books are great, and the core competencies and techniques are still sound, but the actual materials available seem to have changed a bit. if the poseurs bring money to film, why judge their motivation? there's always a chance that some of them will take it to the next step.

could you combat reviewer creep with a reverse creep? review things from previous decades? "introduced 30 years ago today." examine early digital with modern eyes?

rotate the back to select V-H? allow replacing the hood with an eyeprism. I like the grip. make it light. I suddenly have an urge to take a walk and shoot a roll of spring on the RB67...