This is Amillennialist's Typepad Profile.
Join Typepad and start following Amillennialist's activity
Join Now!
Already a member? Sign In
Constantinople, Byzantium
Recent Activity
I posted this at the (lying) Friendly Atheist 'blog: The reason Muhammad's child-sex-slavery-as-marriage is relevant in a discussion of Islam and its adherents is that Muhammad is considered "Allah's beautiful pattern of conduct" for those who want to please it. He is Islam's "Ideal Man," and so everything he said and did (and permitted) is prescriptive for Muslims. As for the Old Testament, there's no comparison between actual Divine judgment of great evil -- which Muhammad is no doubt experiencing personally right now -- and claiming a "divine" mandate for whatever evil Muhammad wanted to commit. And don't be absurd about Mary. While we don't know her age, she was no poor, little, prepubescent nine-year-old. She was old enough to be married in Israel. Neither was she being raped. (Are you illiterate?) Only the craven and the perverse can make such a vile and false moral equivalence. You should be ashamed.
The KKK was the terrorist arm of the Democrat Party. Don't be such a liberal.
Toggle Commented Nov 13, 2013 on "Knock-out" at Atlas Shrugs
The historicity of the Biblical texts are obvious to all but the deranged and the genocidal. (That's why leftists and Muslims don't get it.)
He's great on Islam. (Christianity, not so much.)
It is the Left who is "Islamophobic" -- as if it's possible to have an irrational fear of an ideology with a fourteen-hundred-year history of "kill the pagans wherever you find them" (Qur'an 9:5) -- since they fear what Muslims will do if our governments and media tell the truth. And then there's that sizable chunk on the Left who want Islam to succeed, since they understand intuitively that Islam is a mortal enemy of Christianity, and they hate Christians/Conservatives more than the genocidal pedophile Muhammad and his progeny (forgetting that once those who believe in our Founding Principles are dead or in chains, there will be no one left to protect them from their murderously-intolerant bedfellows.)
"Allah’s Apostle said, '. . . I have been made victorious with terror . . .'" (Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220).
Muhammad is some demon's perpetual virgin in hell.
Too many questions . . . to which the answers are obvious: 1) If Obama is the "smartest president ever" and was raised Muslim, then how can he lie about the jihad against us? (That'd be murderous treason if an American were to do it.) 2) If the MSA is an unindicted co-conspirator in a federal terrorism funding case and a branch of an international Muslim terrorist group whose stated goal is to bring down Western Civilization from within, then how can any non-Muslim media treat any member of the MSA -- or any other Muslim group -- as anything less than their mortal enemy? 3) If this were 1943, would our media be interviewing Joseph Goebbels asking him his opinion of our monitoring elements of the Third Reich within our own borders? 4) Why must law-abiding non-Muslims be raped by their own government when they want to travel when it's ONLY MUSLIMS who ignite their underwear, shoes, and vehicles in barbaric attempts to murder and maim? When will Americans refuse to allow our political, media, and academic "elites" to lie any longer about the enemy we face? It is traditional, orthodox, historical, Just-as-Muhammad-intended Islam, and Muslims are its agents. Period. End-of-story. 5) What will it take for non-Muslim media to refer to Muhammad fairly and accurately? Rather than "the prophet Muhammad" (or some variant), it ought to be just "the genocidal pedophile Muhammad" or some other modifiers giving credit where credit is due.
Toggle Commented Feb 19, 2012 on Who is Leaking this? at Atlas Shrugs
New York is the New Constantinople:
CNO, your own words betray the truth: If anyone "discriminates" against a person of Arabic appearance, it's not because they appear Arabic, but because of the likelihood that they are an emulator of the genocidal pedophile Muhammad. Considering 1400 years of jihad -- including 9/11 and 18,000 documented jihad attacks since -- how is any fear of Islam "irrational"? "Islamophobia" is impossible. But if Muslims want to end it, then they should stop raping, enslaving, and beheading non-Muslims (and Muslim apostates, women, and little girls).
The 720 number is not working. And to the few dissenters posting here: Are you devout Muslims or suicidal leftists? If the former, know that every day, more and more Americans are learning the truth about your genocidal pedophile Muhammad. You will be stopped. You will not succeed in establishing shari'a. If the latter, you ought to realize that once you and your partners-in-crime are through devouring actual Americans, they will turn on you and consume you, too, just as their "deity" commands. To them, you're not even deserving of the "protection" offered to Jews and Christians, you're only a pagan and so deserving of slaughter.
Toggle Commented Oct 26, 2011 on "Hyatt Place Regrets Decison" at Atlas Shrugs
I think Alex's comment was in response to the politician nesciently defending the genocidal pedophile Muhammad.
If this is monstrous -- and it is -- it serves also to highlight the barbarity of the West's abortion addiction.
Truth should be enough of a defense, but if it's not, WND needs to release the book in .pdf format free of charge. They can't take everyone's copy.
Saturday, March 26, 2011 Only the deranged, the perverse, and Muslims can ask, "what makes you any better than muslims who stone women for similar reasons set out in the Bible?" Could it be that . . . I'm not stoning anyone? This is not about "being better than" anyone; we are all sinners deserving of God's wrath and dependent solely on His mercy in Christ. This is about telling the truth, by which souls are saved from hell and non-Muslims are saved from hell-on-Earth. In reply to someone throwing Muhammad's hellish bathwater on the Baby: Hi, I'm Richard and I think Islam . . . , Essentially, you're mad because you're not God. You don't like his definition of "sin" (thanks for admitting that). Fine. Create a universe, and then you can make up your own rules. Until then, can't you at least deal honestly with the Biblical texts? Do you misrepresent the Bible and its God out of ignorance only, or is it just pure cosmos envy? (Let's see, you hate, defame, and blaspheme the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and His Christ, attribute sinful human qualities to God (God's "jealousy" is His desire for all to live, not a misogynist's possessiveness), make yourself your own god, and blame God for human evil. Are you sure you're not Muslim?) If you really were concerned about the Problem of Pain and not just sniping, I'd point out that whatever evils and injustices you want to attribute to God, He endured the greatest evil and injustice of all, willingly sacrificing His own Son (Who willingly made the sacrifice) to pay for the sins of all. God reconciled men to Himself in Christ's body on the cross. The greater mystery is not why God allows suffering, but why He would suffer and die for a sinful humanity which rages against Him. As for your "arguments" . . .
Toggle Commented Mar 30, 2011 on I love huh! at Atlas Shrugs
More of Islam is a fascist's own personal jihad against the truth. Those aren't honor killings; those are specific crimes forbidden by the Mosaic Law.
Toggle Commented Mar 26, 2011 on I love huh! at Atlas Shrugs
You're not honest, Islam. First, you blame God for wiping out violent humanity, then you whine, "Why doesn't God do something about evil?" You can't have it both ways. Why do you blame God for human evil? Are you trying to justify your own sin? Why do you need to defame God? You admit that there is no command to genocide, but you make up one anyway with "it does condone it." Nowhere will you find commands to enslave unbelievers; as I pointed out, the regulations involving slavery were given to ameliorate its effects. As for "justifying stoning," were the commands regarding it in the context of capital punishment under the Mosaic Law for the people of Israel only, or not? How else were the Hebrews to punish evil? Candy canes and lollipops? Harshly-worded notes? The essential difference between Judaism (which is really what you're attacking here) and Islam is this: the God you libel has a right to punish sin (which you were complaining He doesn't do). That's the same God Who gave humanity the Ten Commandments, the Golden Rule, and His own Son as the propitiation for the sins of the whole world (God punished all evil in His body on the cross, which is a mercy, because if God were to destroy all sinners as you wish, there'd be no one left). And what did His Son do? Christ committed no sin, spoke only the truth, healed the sick, raised the dead, died for the sins of the whole world, and resurrected and commanded His people to love even their enemies. What about Muhammad? In Islam, you've got a genocidal pedophile "sacralizing" the violation of all Ten Commandments, the Golden Rule, and non-Muslims and their wives and children and claiming that "Allah made me do it, and you will too, or else!" Your reference to reformation also highlights the difference: When Christianity reformed, it was to its foundational Scriptures. To where does that lead but "Love your neighbor as yourself." When Islam reforms, it points to "kill the pagans wherever you find them." The distinction is clear.
Toggle Commented Mar 25, 2011 on I love huh! at Atlas Shrugs
By the way, Christ died to take away sins, giving us a New and better covenant.
Toggle Commented Mar 25, 2011 on I love huh! at Atlas Shrugs
Islam is a fascist . . . Your comments about Islam are correct; your characterization of the Bible and Christianity is not. The Bible commands neither genocide, honor killing, nor slavery. Stoning was a means of capital punishment under the Mosaic Law for the nation of Israel only. (There were no electric chairs, lethal injections, nor firing squads in those days. No, death is never pretty.) There was a one-time command to war against the inhabitants of the cities of Canaan; this was because of their previous attacks against helpless Israel and their great sin (you do know what their worship of Molech involved, don't you?). (It is worth noting that Israel later faced the same fate for the same sins.) Slavery was ubiquitous; the laws set up under Moses were to ameliorate its harmful effects, not to promote it.
Toggle Commented Mar 25, 2011 on I love huh! at Atlas Shrugs
If Muslims have been butchering, raping, and enslaving non-Muslims (and Muslim apostates, women, and little girls) for fourteen hundred years in obedience to Allah and his genocidal pedophile prophet, then "Islamophobia" is grammatically-impossible. (You do know what a "phobia" is, don't you?)
Toggle Commented Mar 25, 2011 on I love huh! at Atlas Shrugs
TypePad HTML Email I want everyone’s honor protected. Protecting Logan’s honor and reporting the facts of what occurred are two different things. For her own sake, I hope that she was not brutalized. For the sake of Western Civilization, our media need to stop covering up for Islam.
If so, probably secularized military and Muslim women who live every day with Muhammad's misogyny. More importantly, from where did these animals' belief that they had a right to destroy this "Jew's" body come? Wake up.
Clueless sara, Islam commands the rape of non-Muslims and Muslim women and little girls. Wake up.