These 3 areas of insight look like part of a taxonomy of approaches toward the same goal. Any of them could create awful or awesome results, with varying degrees of time, individual engagement, or - god forbid - innovation. They may also all tend towards different kinds of results. Awesome things are often awesome in ways that aren't shared with each other. Categorizing and analyzing all awesome results together is as impractical as creating a music genre called "good music." I guess I have taxonomies on the brain today. At the implementation level, we use the word "awesome," for the connotation and sustainment of enthusiasm, which is important to our success. I am now alerted to its use as a buzzword, thanks to you.