This is Bill Peckham's Typepad Profile.
Join Typepad and start following Bill Peckham's activity
Join Now!
Already a member? Sign In
Bill Peckham
Seattle, Washington USA
Sign Maker; Volunteer; Blogger; Dialyzor.
Recent Activity
Nice to see this post called out, even if it is to wonder why I don't still post to DSEN. Time. Time is the short answer. For the last five or so years I have worked full time through the Carpenters Union making signs for tradeshows. The workload is unpredictable but in general I haven't had the energy or really the heart to keep up the blog or advocacy generally. I was an advocate for 10 years, from 2000 to 2010. An advocate meaning engaged in trying to shape national policy in the provision of dialysis, I saw myself as working to improve how severe kidney disease is experienced. DSEN was a part of it but when I think about my engagement extending for that whole decade and while I can point to successes on the whole I think the experience of having severe kidney disease has gotten worse over time. That dealing with severe kidney disease is harder today that it was 10 years ago and ten years ago it was harder than ten years before that. That's what I am thinking about when I say I didn't have the heart to keep blogging, I didn't have the heart to continue to be an advocate. I didn't see progress in making the experience of ESRD better. Watch this video , it showcases the vision of what it meant to use dialysis in the late '70s we've retreated from this progressive vision.
1 reply
Here is a photo of the meal I received in Tassin in 1996 Until renal administrators offer more than one schedule incenter, until they stop telling themselves they are doing enough, I'm not sure what a nephrologist can do. In my judgement it is the renal administrators that must take the first step to improving the provision of dialysis.
Becky I usually take the cart I have at home with me when I travel by car, the machine is heavy but thankfully I can still lift it.
1 reply
Theresa my experience is that it takes dialysis, diet and exercise to thrive with severe kidney disease. I have this post Expected dialysis lifespan: How long does someone live who is on dialysis? from 7 years ago but it still reflects my thoughts.
1 reply
Carmen it is common for people who need dialysis to stop urinating, dialysis's job is to remove what is normally removed by urination.
1 reply
Miriam insurance is for things that are unexpected, so no it would not be available to reimburse expected medical expenses.
1 reply
Emma it often takes a while to grow accustom to the rigors of using hemodialysis, for some people the transition is pretty quick with few bumps, for others it can be much more difficult. Ordinarily that washed out, hungover feeling is made worse when the fluid shifts to quickly or too far too quick. Does your hubby still urinate? Some types of kidney disease - PKD for instance - leave a person still producing urine. If this is the case hemidialysis needs to be done differently than it is for the majority of people incenter. In general I think you would be helped by joining an online discussion group, Facebook seems to be where every one goes today or if you prefer try a dedicated support site
1 reply
The URL for Peter's blog, HemoDoc, has been updated. Please let me know if you'd like a URL changed.
1 reply
Does your husband want to stop working? I ask because from what you wrote it sounds like you expect him to need to stop working. That is a mistake. You asked “How did you get to where you are with kidney disease” which I took to mean “How is it you you’ve made your kidney disease a small part of your life while working full time, volunteering and traveling” my answer is I’ve done that by working a physical job. My physical job deserves a lot of the credit for how well I’ve accommodated dialysis for the last 24 years – since I was 27 years old. Rather than bending your husband to fit the requirements of kidney disease you should be looking for ways to bend kidney disease to fit your husband. I don’t know your husband but it sounds like he is the type of guy who, like me, needs to work. It’s what we do. Now it may be that the damn disease will make it impossible to continue his work but unless he tries, how can anyone really know? If you want a normalish life living with severe kidney disease you have try to live a normalish life. If having a normalish life includes working then you need to continue working until you can’t, until you try and try again and just can’t work. Don’t stop working because you think there will be a time when you can’t so why even try.
1 reply
Hi Dayna I couldn’t do my job – I work through the Carpenters’ Union producing graphics for tradeshows – if having a fistula meant you can’t lift. The thing to avoid with a fistula is carrying weight across it – for instance a strap across my forearm is a no no, or carrying a bundle of wood with the weight across my forearms. Lifting things with your hand is fine once the surgery has healed and after starting dialysis he’d want to make sure the needle sites were fully clotted. I give my physical job a lot of the credit for how well I am able to accommodate dialysis. I started working through the union in 1995 after four years of using dialysis. At the time I felt I was in a downward spiral of not having energy, not doing much, not eating well, and not sleeping well – each thing made the other symptoms worse. Once I started working – as a new hire I got a lot of the more physical jobs on show site – I ate better, slept better, which gave me more energy which allowed me to do more, it was an upward spiral each thing made the other symptoms better. I’ve been doing lone dialysis at home overnight since January 2008 and have found it to be the least burdensome form of treatment over the 24 years using hemodialysis. I give over about five hours of awake time a week to dialysis, while receiving over 30 hours a week of medicine (aka dialysis) which means using home nocturnal hemodialysis has little impact on my day to day activities and leaves me feeling well. The key thing to consider is awake time spent dealing with treatment or how to maximize your awake time. To me the important thing to figure out is how to give yourself the most time awake and productive, home nocturnal does this better than any other version of hemodialysis that I’ve tried. As far as the diet I’d go with what the doctor is telling you, having diabetes and kidney disease is tough, my main concern would be making sure he’s eating enough calories, malnutrition is more of a problem than having a bit too much sodium
1 reply
I dialyzed incenter for 11 years and was a dialysis success story during that time - I worked, volunteered and traveled the world. Since 2001 I have dialyzed at home and continued to be a success, working volunteering and traveling but in addition I've felt better. Not only do I feel better, I think the way I dialyze currently, over night and more than four times a week, is the least burdensome way I have dialyzed in my 23 years of using hemodialysis. I'd say give home hemodialysis a try, the only way to know for sure if it is good fit is to see for yourself.
1 reply
By Bill Peckham I'm dialyzing for the second time on my trip through the Grand Canyon, this was the most challenging treatment. The video starts with the question what did you think about today's treatment? In the middle, I'm talking... Continue reading
By Bill Peckham I'm answering questions over at Reddit. If you've ever wanted to ask me something about dialysis, advocacy, nonprofit governance, travel or sign making now is your chance. Ask me anything. Continue reading
Thanks Zach, a wee bit early but let the festivities begin :) August 30 I'll turn 50!
1 reply
By Bill Peckham I've been back a week; I am still absorbing the experience of spending 8 days rafting 225 miles through the Grand Canyon. Everything went well, I completed three hemodialysis treatments using the NxStage, literally dialyzing on a... Continue reading
By Bill Peckham The short answer is: I've been working. I've kept my insurance coverage current since I returned to a focus on work in 2010. I feel stronger, healthier than I did three years ago; my grip strength is... Continue reading
Medicare will not pay anything towards dialysis outside of the US. Medicare only reimburses for dialysis provided at units it can have inspected - which is why reimbursement is not available abroad or even on dialysis cruises that occur entirely in US waters or leave/return from/to a US port. As far as the cost, Orlando, it has been nearly 15 years since I traveled in Spain but as far as I remember the cost per treatment was in the neighborhood of 300 Euros. I think it is possible that if you identify yourself as being an unreimbursed self pay dialyzor they may give you a better deal.
1 reply
I think your self righteousness is very unatractive. If you can read the article and come away thinking that Dr Kelly or anyone else in Seattle is proposing to withhold dialysis "those that the "committee" deems inappropriate" then you have failed as a reader. If you can not accept the salience of the fact that people are being given an inappropriate treatment, then you are blind to a great deal of avoidable human suffering. Human suffering in the service of profits is not something I would wave away in the name of self determination.
Again, do you think there are people in the US put on dialysis inappropriately? Meaning are there people in the US that are using dialysis that would be expected to have a better outcome forgoing dialysis?
My spell correct substituted "contentedness" for "centeredness" in the above post ... but really contentedness is not a bad concept to keep in mind for this discussion. Point taken, spell check, point taken.
The idea that someone with dementia should be subjected to a high dose of dialysis does not sound like patient contentedness to me and it does not sound optimal. I would not advocate for high dose dialysis for someone who is confined to a psychiatric unit. I would not expect a heroin addict to use a WAK. Optimal dialysis can mean conservative therapy. Patient contentedness can mean conservative therapy. The issue is that no one is in the business of providing conservative therapy. People are being sold the idea of dialysis as a universal treatment for CKD5 when, I think, a clear eyed evaluation would suggest that better choice woiuld be a conservative approach. And further, I believe, absent the CKD5 profit motive more people would use a conservative therapy when faced with failed kidneys and a conservative therapy, in those cases, from the point of view of the ill, would result in a better outcome. In Italy, more people use a conservative therapy than in the US. Does that mean that they are killing their elderly? Does that mean that there are death panels? I would say that it may well be an indication that more people are getting an appropriate treatment. Peter, would you say that in the US there are people put on dialysis who should not be on dialysis? I would say that in your vision of a non profit US dialysis world fewer people would be using dialysis because today people are being inappropriately dialyzed, in part due to the CKD profit motive. I don't think most readers of the article read a call for death panels, rather I think that Dr. Kelly's point is that everything pushes towards using dialysis - a powerful and entrenched business of dialysis amplifies the hopes of the ill and their families to create a system that is, to the eye of sympathetic observers, cruel. The cruelty of the system occurs not when an 84 year old dementia patient is denied daily dialysis. The cruelty occurs when that individual is subjected to dialysis at all. Where is that voice in the system? Where is the voice that pushes back against the vested interests?, the poorly informed?, the disinterested? Dr Kelly was calling for better outcomes, for patient contentedness, for frank conversations. Responding with calls for a WAK and higher doses of dialysis misses the point.
Well then your position isn't that dialysis needs to go farther, it's that physicians shouldn't concern themselves with being stewards of our medical resource. Medical care, dialysis, is a limited resource, not because someone is being a despot, but because that is the nature of medicine - demand will always outstrip supply. Scribner was not one to wave off uncomfortable realities, Dr. Kelley, a Scribner protege, is continuing the practice.
"He ticks off real-life cases: A 40-ish heroin user who injects heroin into her dialysis catheter, causing serious infections, and skips dialysis sessions. She says: "I want to dialyze. I want to take heroin." A 60-year-old patient who has been receiving dialysis for nearly two years in a locked hospital psych unit, despite violent outbursts in which he hits his nurses. No other facility will take him. A dying patient, unable to make decisions for herself, whose daughter, armed with a power-of-attorney, insists." Which of these cases is a case of dialysis not going far enough?
I can't say that there have been system wide advances in the last 15 years, there has been change but the care a person receives still, to a great degree, depends on their zip code. The system we have today works best for people who engage with their care, and who can find a good provider/physician to work with. For anyone facing severe kidney disease I recommend reading HELP, I NEED DIALYSIS! How to have a good future with kidney disease which is available through Amazon or here Diet (and exercise) can improve outcomes at every stage of kidney disease, the book can walk you through how. I have a few links for dietary and recipie informaiton here
1 reply