"Here's the thing: while dye transfer prints have an undeniable cachet, and so command exalted prices, they are not, artistically and aesthetically, obviously superior to digital inkjet prints" And will someone please give me a pithy answer for the next person who earnestly explains to me at an exhibition how the photographer "still only uses film". Here am I looking at a display of skill and artistry that actually transcends the technology used to create it and all that some people see is how the image was captured (I don't like that word) and how it was transferred to paper. It's only a small step from "you take good pictures - you must have a good camera".