So you got me here with the UniPegKit bribe, but all it took was one look at that Seamus-face to convince me that I could fore go my grande Americanos at the coffee shop for a week and instead put the money towards allowing more people to find their dogs. Because we all need at least one dog in our lives.

You had me laughing with your tweeting of RepoMan, first off. Having a somewhat stressful night myself, it was a nice distraction, and thank you. Therefore I caught your tweet back to GamePolitics and started following it. I thought he/she was a bit off, to be honest. A quick Google search of 'Wil Wheaton Game politics' came back with a couple of articles they have done (for heaven's sake) about you and your advocacy work. So if this individual, who is supposed to represent that body, can't even look through the group's archives, yes, they come off as an idiot. Furthermore, someone who is representing a group that uses written communication as a business model should be able to understand the nuances of the genre. The question came off as a blatant violation of the Wheaton's Law, at least in my book.

Great interview (as has been said many times now!). I am so impressed by what a genuine person you are. I really enjoy your tweets (especially the conversations you have with your dog), your geek glee in so very many things, and the wry observations of the world. I am a fan of several celebrities, but in your case it is less being a fan than it is just really liking someone.