The fact we create and fund charter schools that graduate fewer than 30 seniors a year... That ought to be a question for the special select committee on funding. Is it efficient? Is this charter, and many others like it that are under-enrolled.. Should these be supported by the state, given budgetary constraints? And, of course, why would two state officials attend something that has yielded as few as two-dozen graduates? It does seem like a slap in the face to schools that graduate 400, 600 seniors every year. But this isn't about the kids, right? It's about election year job security.