This is LR's TypePad Profile.
Join TypePad and start following LR's activity
LR
Recent Activity
@mahonj: In the figure, the solid portion of the PHEV results only accounts for GHG emissions associated with gasoline propulsion. Since the hydro scenario only results in GHG emissions from gasoline for the assumed system boundary, the overall GHG emissions for that scenario are equivalent to those from gasoline propulsion. There is an explanation in the figure caption that the left-hand side bars, which only show gasoline related GHG emissions, correspond to the hydro scenario. The vehicle specifications can be found in the supporting information. The difference between the HEV and Prius results can be explained by a more powerful engine and higher curb weight, more aggressive driving cycles, and use of a well-to-wheel system boundary (which includes refining and transport, as you said).
@HarveyD: The paper notes that the authors declare no financial conflict of interest.
Univ of Toronto study details impacts of interaction between driving patterns and electricity generation for WTW energy use and GHG emissions for PHEVs
WTW GHG emissions of vehicles across driving patterns and PHEV charging scenarios. Solid portions represent GHG emissions associated with gasoline propulsion. Patterned portions represent GHG emissions associated with electric propulsion. (Solid left bar = hydro electricity scenario.) Credit...
LR is now following The Typepad Team
May 23, 2012
Subscribe to LR’s Recent Activity
