This is rjs's TypePad Profile.
Join TypePad and start following rjs's activity
Join Now!
Already a member? Sign In
rjs
denizen of a rural NE Ohio swamp
unencumbered by education, affiliations, beliefs or agenda; im not advocating anything
Recent Activity
hmmm...if someone is having trouble commenting, how are they to respond?
1 reply
checking to see if your comments are working...mark thoma is having a fit... http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2013/06/legit-comments-marked-as-spam.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+typepad%2FKupd+%28Economist%27s+View%29
Toggle Commented Jun 6, 2013 on Rain delay at Environmental Economics
1 reply
umm, goldman sachs said that last week.. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-05-06/goldman-caves-unemployment-rate-inappropriate-measure-labor-market
1 reply
frankel suggests that the use of fracking has been responsible for reducing CO2 emissions, as utilities switch from coal to gas... however, measurements at the wellhead show as much as 9% of the methane from fracked wells escapes into the atmosphere... methane is about 21 times as potent a greenhouse gas as CO2 in the long term, but 72 times as potent over a 20 year horizon...and new charts show methane's global warming potential is more than 130 times that of carbon dioxide over a period of ten years...the EPA is in the process of increasing it's expected greenhouse impact... according to the World Meteorological Organization's annual report on 2011 greenhouse gases, atmospheric methane hit a new high of 1813 parts per billion (ppb) in 2011, which was 259% of the pre-industrial level; since CO2 levels were at 390.9 parts per million (ppm) in 2011, that means methane's net warming effect is already one-third that of CO2 over 20 years…
Toggle Commented Apr 19, 2013 on Links for 04-19-2013 at Economist's View
1 reply
FYI, obama signed that, citing national security concerns...
my old farmhouse was built in 1890 and it's going to fall down someday...would you say that its price could increase faster than inflation indefinitely from here?
1 reply
very. if i'd have known that, i'd have coded the html for the above link...
Toggle Commented Apr 14, 2013 on Links for 04-14-2013 at Economist's View
1 reply
"The Social Security “trust fund”? That’s an accounting mechanism, not an actual pot of money." ... care to explain what this $2.729 trillion in Treasury bonds is? http://www.ssa.gov/cgi-bin/investheld.cgi
Toggle Commented Apr 14, 2013 on Links for 04-14-2013 at Economist's View
1 reply
+ 1
Toggle Commented Apr 3, 2013 on 'Dark Pool Trading' at Economist's View
1 reply
just check BLS: The 30 occupations with the largest projected employment growth, 2010-20 http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecopro.t06.htm other than nurses and teachers, most of the top ten dont even require a high school diploma..
1 reply
dont count your chickens.. 8 - 14 day temperature outook: http://www.localweather.com/weather/maps/outlooks/temp/814day/us.html
1 reply
ok, anne, how much of that is home equity? because, if you recall, what we wanted to know is how realistic is the proposal that seniors forego social security for several years to allow it to build to a sizable monthly stipend...
Toggle Commented Mar 23, 2013 on Links for 03-23-2013 at Economist's View
1 reply
from thursday: "the largest increases in median debt were experienced in households with householders age 35 to 44 (to $108,000), 45 to 54 (to $86,500) and 55 to 64 (to $70,000)." http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/cb13-51.html
Toggle Commented Mar 23, 2013 on Links for 03-23-2013 at Economist's View
1 reply
of course, net worth includes home equity...and the old folk cant buy much catfood with home equity...
Toggle Commented Mar 23, 2013 on Links for 03-23-2013 at Economist's View
1 reply
what about the 57% of workers who reported less than $25,000 in total household savings? http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323639604578368823406398606.html 'Workers Saving Too Little to Retire'
Toggle Commented Mar 23, 2013 on Links for 03-23-2013 at Economist's View
1 reply
re "my comment doesn't make any sense" funny, that's exactly what i thought when i read it...
Toggle Commented Mar 19, 2013 on Superstar at Environmental Economics
1 reply
Mankiw & Hubbard were the architects of the Bush tax cuts...
1 reply
The 30 occupations with the largest projected employment growth, 2010-20 http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecopro.t06.htm of the top 9, only one requires more than high school; 5 do not even require high school
1 reply
there's another draft bill being worked on, for which they want public comments: "All comments are welcome and can be submitted by email to cutcarbon@mail.house.gov. The Lawmakers are requesting that comments be submitted no later than April 12, 2013."
1 reply
Why Does Anyone Listen to Paul Ryan? i dont think anyone does...the only place i see or hear coverage of his budget proposal is here or other left leaning blogs or websites...
1 reply
in answer to your question, it became expensive oil...
1 reply
up here in the geauga county snow belt its been sunny & in the low forties today...snow is melted enough you might get some practice in...not bad for early march..
Toggle Commented Mar 6, 2013 on Global warming my a$$ at Environmental Economics
1 reply
can someone explain to me how the sequestered cuts came to be $85 billion? (as is now widely quoted) my understanding was the debt control act specified $1.2 tillion over ten years; with the imputed interest on the debt savings that would amount to $92.1 trillion a year, which was the figure widely used by the press and analysts until recently... even earlier, it had been marked at $109.3 billion per year by such as CBPP: http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=3635
Toggle Commented Mar 2, 2013 on Links for 03-02-2013 at Economist's View
1 reply
at just 1.25 million listeners, he doesnt even have a tenth the audience of limbaugh or hannity: http://www.talkers.com/top-talk-radio-audiences/
1 reply