This is Mark Schweber's TypePad Profile.
Join TypePad and start following Mark Schweber's activity
Mark Schweber
Recent Activity
i think it is wrong that the government is being misleading about confidentiality. The information is confidential only for 72 years and then it is all made public. You might say that 72 years is a long time but if it is marketed as "confidential" many people would thing that means always. The Census Bureau should be up front and say in all its marketing that the information is confidential for 72 years.
A Proud Day For The Census
Yesterday was a wonderful day for the country. The Justice Department responded to some concerns about the confidentiality of census data by expressing their view that no provision of the Patriot Act overrides the confidentiality law that protects census data. This legal position agrees with the...
The census information can not be considered confidential. It is going to be released in 70 years. To be considered confidential it would have to never ever be released. In fact the raw data should be destroyed once it is compiled.
A Proud Day For The Census
Yesterday was a wonderful day for the country. The Justice Department responded to some concerns about the confidentiality of census data by expressing their view that no provision of the Patriot Act overrides the confidentiality law that protects census data. This legal position agrees with the...
I just noticed that the census form distinguishes between biological and adopted children by asking "adoptive daughter/son" or biological daughter/son.
This labeling of children is insulting, demeaning and and unnecessary. Legally there is no distinction.
Had the form asked in a separate question something like "did the child come into the family through adoption" that would have been acceptable bececause it is not directly labeling the child
I can not in good conscious answer that question so I am going to write in my own check box and title it daughter/son and then I will check that.
But the Census Bureau should be ashamed to be so insensitive in the way it worded its form. You deserve to have people throw the form in the trash because of what you did.
Misinformation About the Census
Looking over the Internet - both blogs, comments to websites, and emails - I am seeing some misinformation about what individuals must report on the 2010 Census. It might be a good time to remind us all of these requirements. Article 1, Section 2 of the US Constitution says: “Representatives and...
I just noticed that the census form distinguishes between biological and adopted children by asking "adoptive daughter/son" or biological daughter/son.
This labeling of children is insulting, demeaning and and unnecessary.
Had the form asked in a separate question something like "did the child come into the family through adoption" that would have been acceptable bececause it is not directly labeling the child
I can not in good conscious answer that question so I am going to write in my own check box and title it daughter/son and then I will check that.
But the Census Bureau should be ashamed to be so insensitive in the way it worded its form. You deserve to have people throw the form in the trash because of what you did.
Children Count Too!
It’s often a surprise to many people when they learn that children tend to be undercounted in US censuses. Most can imagine various types of adults who fail to participate in censuses, but don’t immediately think of children being missed. Based on prior evaluations there are two basic reasons fo...
Mark Schweber is now following The Typepad Team
Mar 17, 2010
Subscribe to Mark Schweber’s Recent Activity
