This is Jared's TypePad Profile.
Join TypePad and start following Jared's activity
Jared
London
Book loon. Occasional llama.
Recent Activity
New Releases: The Skybound Sea by Sam Sykes
Posted 6 hours ago at pornokitsch
Comment
0
New Releases: Blood Song by Anthony Ryan
Posted yesterday at pornokitsch
Comment
1
Pandemonium Updates: New & Old Titles [Updated!]
Posted 2 days ago at pornokitsch
Comment
0
Good spot, thank you!
That'd be an amazing film. I'm sorry they didn't make them while Clint Eastwood was still making Westerns - I wonder who would play him now...
Underground Reading: Edge - The Loner by George G. Gilman
The Loner is the first book in the long-running Edge series by George G. Gilman (Terry Harknett). From 1972 to 1989, Josiah "Edge" Hedge shot, stabbed, slashed and generally mayhemmed n' mayhacked his way through an astonishing 61 volumes of Western adventure. (63 if you count the two cross-ove...
True! I didn't actually say he was self-published, I guess the Hocking/Howey comparisons come across like that...
Review Round-up: Jesus, Bridesicles and New York City
Three recent releases with very little in common. Will McIntosh's Love Minus Eighty (2013) is coming this June. I've not read him before, but from what I understand, Mr. McIntosh is sort of an ebook/indie sensation, not in the "sells like Hugh Howey or Amanda Hocking" way, but in the "there's ...
I would say that "winning a Hugo short story award" = "quietly making waves".
Some people will think that definition is cruel, others generous.
Review Round-up: Jesus, Bridesicles and New York City
Three recent releases with very little in common. Will McIntosh's Love Minus Eighty (2013) is coming this June. I've not read him before, but from what I understand, Mr. McIntosh is sort of an ebook/indie sensation, not in the "sells like Hugh Howey or Amanda Hocking" way, but in the "there's ...
Same guy. I've not read Soft Apocalypse but have heard good things. There are a few references to a "soft apocalypse" within Love Minus Eighty - I don't know if they're somehow connected?
Review Round-up: Jesus, Bridesicles and New York City
Three recent releases with very little in common. Will McIntosh's Love Minus Eighty (2013) is coming this June. I've not read him before, but from what I understand, Mr. McIntosh is sort of an ebook/indie sensation, not in the "sells like Hugh Howey or Amanda Hocking" way, but in the "there's ...
Review Round-up: Jesus, Bridesicles and New York City
Posted 4 days ago at pornokitsch
Comment
8
That's a really good point - I love the stark white background on this.
I think the leggiest of all McGinnis' ladies has to be the one from Losers Live Longer. Even with a landscape cover, her foot doesn't fit.
Underground Reading: The Girl with the Long Green Heart by Lawrence Block
This is the latest installment in our scheme to review each and every Hard Case Crime publication, one every week. You can follow along here. Well, one week after my least favourite Hard Case Crime (so far), I get to review one of my favourites (so far) - Lawrence Block's The Girl with the Lo...
Underground Reading: The Girl with the Long Green Heart by Lawrence Block
Posted 6 days ago at pornokitsch
Comment
2
Post-script: Archaelogy & Unearthed
Posted May 12, 2013 at pornokitsch
Comment
0
The Kitschies: Submissions & 2013 Judges
Introducing the 2013 judges - and opening for submissions! Continue reading
Posted May 11, 2013 at pornokitsch
Comment
0
Underground Reading: The Colorado Kid by Stephen King
Posted May 9, 2013 at pornokitsch
Comment
0
The Lowest Heaven - Limited Edition
Posted May 8, 2013 at pornokitsch
Comment
0
Post-script: Upgrades
Posted May 5, 2013 at pornokitsch
Comment
2
Dark Societies and AMA
Maybe not ANYTHING. But most things. Continue reading
Posted May 2, 2013 at pornokitsch
Comment
0
Stories of the Smoke: Going, going...
Posted Apr 30, 2013 at pornokitsch
Comment
0
I disagree on a lot of that (obviously). Specifically regarding The Panopticon, another SF/F award recognised it (granted, The Kitschies only require "elements of the speculative or fantastic" so have a much lower threshold for what constitutes science fictional). So whether or not The Panopticon is SF/F isn't really an open and shut case.* What bothers me is that whether or not The Panopticon is SF, the judges would never (officially) know.
I'm also not sure that arguing on a book by book basis is the right way about this.** There were more than 16 books with female authors published last year. Some of them were probably even science fiction. I guess the question is, who is responsible for getting them in front of the judges? How "activist" should the judges be? Is not being activist a form of activism? Etc.
*[On that note, in regards to another book on the shortlist, Maureen Kincaid Speller's review of The Dog Stars wasn't SF "according to any criteria I’d care to exercise". I don't actually agree, with her, but I think it is interesting that we are, again, reminded that people define SF in radically different ways. Which is part of the kerfuffle about this whole thing, I guess.]
**[I think we're also coming about this from completely opposite ends here. Given the remit of finding "the best science fiction novel of the year", I would far rather argue why a great novel is science fictional than why a science fiction novel is great. I can completely understand the opposite approach, but it isn't for me. (That said, all a tangent - I don't have any questions about the quality of the books on the shortlist!)]
The 2013 Arthur C. Clarke Shortlist: An Imaginary Judgement
There are lots of great pieces already about the Clarke Award. Strange Horizons has done a round-up or two that highlights some of this year's discussion. I think Chris Gerwel's piece comparing the Clarke discussion to the Hugo discussion is particularly interesting. To brutally summarise what...
I'm a sucker for him too. Although I generally find him interchangeable with King... or, at the very least, extraordinarily similar to King's pulpier horror.
Review Round-up: Vintage Classics (and Not-So-Classics)
We've just returned from a long weekend in Lyme Regis, our favourite escape. Dinosaurs and literary landmarks! Bakeries on every corner! We spent most of our stay buying delicious foodstuffs and eating them on the terrace (which had a sea view if you stood on the table). Occasionally inclement w...
Review Round-up: Vintage Classics (and Not-So-Classics)
Posted Apr 29, 2013 at pornokitsch
Comment
3
Everywhere but here...
We're not here. Please leave a message. Beep. Continue reading
Posted Apr 26, 2013 at pornokitsch
Comment
1
Speculative Fiction 2012: Out now!
Posted Apr 25, 2013 at pornokitsch
Comment
0
Just as a general aside, I'm really sorry the blog is now randomly dining on people's comments - this has nothing to do with me, and has apparently been happening for a few weeks now. I've got a help ticket in with Typepad because this sucks.
The 2013 Arthur C. Clarke Shortlist: An Imaginary Judgement
There are lots of great pieces already about the Clarke Award. Strange Horizons has done a round-up or two that highlights some of this year's discussion. I think Chris Gerwel's piece comparing the Clarke discussion to the Hugo discussion is particularly interesting. To brutally summarise what...
If I had a tenner, I'd put it on Ken MacLeod. Following much the same logic as you've laid out.
1) You're absolutely right in that this is a hole in the logic - I don't know what's been called in. Every book by a woman that was submitted could've been a specific judicial request. But I do think there are odd absences. I do know of publishers that had books by female authors that weren't called in. And I do know that, when we call in a book for The Kitschies, it generally comes in, or we follow up until it does (but our submissions model is different as the Clarke has a slight fee, but I'd also suggest that the Clarke has vastly more prestige...)) I can also guess that the judges were probably showered with 82 books and no time and didn't even have a chance to think it through properly. But there are weird operating assumptions that the Clarke submissions list is a) an exhaustive list of all works by women in genre and b) the judges are passive victims of what the publishers provide. Neither of which are true!
2) I don't think too much is being read into the quote because that's the only transparency we have into this year's judicial process, in which she explains that many of the books by female authors were excluded for being too fantasy. That is prioritisation. Whether or not that decision impacted books that were of shortlist quality is, of course, impossible to know. Obviously there's also a slippery slope - without any way of knowing what makes a book "SF", how do you know what isn't? I do think the judges have to draw a line somewhere, but, and again, this is all we know - the way that line was drawn this year, female authors were excluded.
2b) This whole thing is speculation. :)
3) No argument here - I said that point was dodgy listing it above. The point being, I suppose, that there can't be a blanket statement that 'women didn't write good SF in 2012' (and I'm not saying that ANYONE has said that!), because other awards have said they have.
Being a Clarke judge seems like the coolest-stroke-most-thankless job in genre.
The 2013 Arthur C. Clarke Shortlist: An Imaginary Judgement
There are lots of great pieces already about the Clarke Award. Strange Horizons has done a round-up or two that highlights some of this year's discussion. I think Chris Gerwel's piece comparing the Clarke discussion to the Hugo discussion is particularly interesting. To brutally summarise what...
The 2013 Arthur C. Clarke Shortlist: An Imaginary Judgement
Posted Apr 24, 2013 at pornokitsch
Comment
13
More...
Subscribe to Jared’s Recent Activity