Actually I did. A couple of times. What are you implying?

Oh.O.K. this comment is just an attempt to be playful. Not mean.

By the way, you can click on the graphic next to your comment and edit your profile to have your real name show up on future comments.

So CeZcplUnmYWedEXuk4PdxWXlzh7n5whHqg, are you saying that belief in a gay gene takes as much faith as a belief in God? That a gay gene is a matter of faith for you?

Actually I don't know any conservatives demanding a gay gene as proof. In fact I have seen most agree with me that it doesn't matter in the end. I see the gay community putting the "gay gene" forward as natural law and conservatives not believing it. Science always backed up the conservatives on this one and now its time to face up to the fact there isn't a "gay gene." Heterosexuality is proven by the fact that men and women were obviously made biologically to come together sexually.

I don't know about petty and mean but I understand what you are saying. I know some people who are not anywhere near petty or mean and they think the marriages should be annulled. They believe it was the Courts fault for causing the huge fiasco to begin with and to allow the marriages to stand creates legal quicksand. I personally, honestly, don't have an opinion on that at the moment. Seriously, not dodging at all, I really don't know what to think about that part.

Well, I am glad to know someone understands what I am trying to express. Hi Ezra!

Awesome. Did you see my DOOM Kitty on Facebook :)? It's purrrrrr-fectly evil.

Very cool interpretation Cindy. Thank you very much.

hmmm... If you look at my thoughts, what I actually typed out as original content for this post, my emphasis was on how my life and testimony is still going on regardless of the APA's ongoing efforts. The second topic I addressed was reacting to LaBarbera and Barber. Thanks for adding your thoughts but I think my point in posting this is clearly not the same as what you think should be emphasized. You should start your own blog and cover aspects you think are missing or ... whatever intrigues you. I didn't choose my sexual proclivities but I certainly have a choice in what I do with them. I definitely was gay and now I am not. That's not a matter of being "objective." It is simply fact.

glad you like it.

Thank you :). It was unbelievable. Very fun.

A guy in England said the same thing. Thanks.

:-p