This is Jim Calloway's Typepad Profile.
Join Typepad and start following Jim Calloway's activity
Jim Calloway
Recent Activity
Five Best Text Recognition Tools
Five Best Text Recognition Tools from Lifehacker Continue reading
Posted Aug 30, 2010 at Jim Calloway's Interesting Stuff Blog
Comment
0
Ebook readers compared
A side-by-side comparison of the Amazon Kindle, B&N Nook, Apple iPad, and Sony Reader http://ow.ly/2wCLd Continue reading
Posted Aug 30, 2010 at Jim Calloway's Interesting Stuff Blog
Comment
0
I'm Just Experimenting Here
Hello, this is Jim Calloway. You may be familar with my blog, Jim Calloway's Law Practice Tips. At this point, I'd suggest you visit that blog. This is an experiment in progress here. I do have a concept and some reasoning behind this, but I'm going to take some time... Continue reading
Posted Aug 22, 2010 at Jim Calloway's Interesting Stuff Blog
Comment
0
Jim Calloway is now following The Typepad Team
Mar 15, 2010
I disagree with one point. Many clients now prefer to receive documents from their professional representatives electronically. Many businesses have digital filing and this saves them the scanning. Some consumers don't want others in their home to have access to their lawyer's mail.
In those cases, sending an e-mail informing them of the new document with a link to a secure client document repository is much more secure than sending them an e-mail attachment. So a secure online client document repository can be a very client-centric practice.
Think Your Clients Use Your Firm's Website?
If you think your website exists primarily for clients, think again. A lot of firms think about investing in pricey features that would be in a client-only portion of the website. Did you know that only about 1% of clients return to a firm’s site after hiring them? And when they do, it’s usual...
I assume even this judge would distinguish online backup, where there is a contract to keep the information stored in the cloud confidential. But this opinion is still stunning in its scope.
E-Mail Not Protected by 4th Amendment, Judge Says
Update: Orin Kerr says he misread the opinion. Read his correction here. The Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures does not apply to e-mail, a federal judge has ruled. The judge's reasoning would seem to sound a warning bell for anyone -- lawyers in particular...
More...
Subscribe to Jim Calloway’s Recent Activity