This is Mark Nowotarski's Typepad Profile.
Join Typepad and start following Mark Nowotarski's activity
Join Now!
Already a member? Sign In
Mark Nowotarski
Darien, CT
Patent agent. Crowdfunding consultant. IP strategy consultant. Innovation Consultant. Public Speaker.
Interests: patents, crowd funding, innovation
Recent Activity
"Where did you come up with that?" Inspired by Dennis's research I did a search on patent applications filed with 200 or more claims to see who was exploring the frontier of massively parallel claiming. That particular application is actually one of a suite of 17 that were all filed by the same applicant (Shell Oil) on the same day (10/24/02) in the same field (in situ thermal processing of oil shales). Taken together, they have nearly 150,000 claims. Is that a record for most claims in a "single" patent application?
1 reply
(try again with functioning link) OT Good article in my local paper today about Marshall Phelps’ new book “"Burning the Ships: Intellectual Property and the Transformation of Microsoft" http://bit.ly/10uOiQ
1 reply
OT Good article in my local paper today about Marshall Phelps’s new book “"Burning the Ships: Intellectual Property and the Transformation of Microsoft" http:// bit.ly/10uOiQ
1 reply
"Actually it represents no such thing." Is my interpretation offensive? I thought it was self evident that a case is appealed when the examiner and applicant cannot reach agreement on what is allowable under the law. If the appeal rate goes down, then overall, the view of applicants and examiners on what the law says is converging. If the appeal rate goes up, then the view of applicants and examiners on what the law says is diverging. The issue isn't who is right or who is wrong. The issue is what fundamental forces are causing this divergence. Why do we both read the same case law, rules, and manual (MPEP) and still come up with such differing views on what is allowable?
1 reply
OT Michael Jackson - patented inventor http://bit.ly/AdUza If it's on Wikipedia it must be true.
1 reply
This graph represents the degree of disagreement between the patent examiner corps and the patent bar as to what the standards of patentability are. For some reason since the 2004 - 2005 time frame, that level of disagreement has been growing exponentially.
1 reply
Also in today's Wall St. Journal: "There is nothing wrong with business-method patents. Inventions can be realized in steel or in the mind" http://bit.ly/JICXW Greg Blonder of AT&T
1 reply
What are the "other" issues that get appealed 18% of the time in biotech?
1 reply
"I do not believe Mr. Kappos is the right choice or even a good choice." As long as there is a strong steady wind, a good sailor can get to where he/she needs to go. The direction of the wind is secondary.
1 reply
"I just hope that someone at the top applies some new ideas to the PTO IT infrastructure." I would add that I hope their are opportunities to help the USPTO make those changes so that they focus on "promoting the useful arts".
1 reply
"Peer-to-Patent is just absolutely spot-on" David Kappos' (next USPTO Dir) view on social network review of patents http://bit.ly/1D6plf
1 reply
"IBM strongly supports the concept of limits on continuation applications." http://bit.ly/IVcrY
1 reply
Opening access to PAIR would be big help. Particularly if the documents were OCRd with permanent URLs.
1 reply
OT, Hey Dennis. If you really want to impress us with statistics, try this. http://bit.ly/zZJRu (Animated graphic of the evolution of world income and mortality statistics for the past 200 years.)
Toggle Commented Jun 12, 2009 on BPAI Backlog at Patent Law Blog (Patently-O)
1 reply