This is twitter.com/TimMontgomerie's Typepad Profile.
Join Typepad and start following twitter.com/TimMontgomerie's activity
Join Now!
Already a member? Sign In
twitter.com/TimMontgomerie
Recent Activity
Thank you Tom - both of those errors have now been corrected.
1 reply
Paul's piece was, imo, a funny response to Nick Clegg's recent use of overblown rhetoric. I'm sorry you didn't agree but it certainly made me laugh.
1 reply
Thanks Andrew. I hope I made clear that local factors were important, as they often will be in UK but interpreted for their national importance.
1 reply
1. We were borrowing even during the boom years. 2. Brown was no Churchill.
1 reply
Labour may say they agree with the moral principles, Richard, but we know they have fallen far short of meeting them. Your list of alternatives is fine but they are more technical than ethical.
1 reply
Okay Sue. Yours is going to be the only comment on this thread on Europe that I'm going to permit. There are other subjects!
1 reply
David, could you suggest anything close to "Labour's one line image of looking after the poor and unemployed"? I ask hopefully!
1 reply
My apologies Your Grace. In my defence principle three is all about the family. Principle five is, in part, about learning and philanthropy. The list is also about the principles that DO underpin this government. You and I may agree about the sanctity of life but our understanding is probably different, eg on abortion, than many government ministers.
1 reply
I think you are out-of-date Richard. The popularity of coalition-style politics has dropped into negative territory over last nine months.
1 reply
William, I would like open primaries in UK in all seats. Every MP should feel accountable in every seat in every election.
1 reply
But kingmaking parties can get influence out of all proportion to their vote. Parties with very small percentages of the vote can hold the balance of power. The tail wags the dog. I don't pretend that FPTP is perfect and primaries to eliminate safe seats are an essential reform (as suggested by William MacDougall elsewhere on this thread).
1 reply
Pathetic Denis. What is wrong with politics is the loss of voters' faith in politicians to be straight with them. AV produces a politics of more hung parliaments, more broken promises and more power for the political class.
1 reply
First past the post is the most popular electoral system in the world. Its key advantage is that it gets rid of unpopular governments. Under most alternatives politicians are harder to eject. My argument against AV is against the system of government it produces. More coalitions. More power for the Lib Dems, Fewer manifesto promises kept. More distrust in politicians. More post-election horsetrading.
1 reply
AV Is only used in three nations in the world but see my answer to "Undergraduate Contribution" at 15:21. Given how AV gives the LibDems more seats they will routinely become the kingmakers of British politics.
1 reply
Australia is not that relevant in this respect. What is relevant are the models that consistently show the LibDems benefiting under AV. Just ask Peter Kellner and Professors Rallings, Thrasher and Bogdanor. It is very hard to argue that coalition politics would not be more likely under AV. You can say that coalition politics is good but it's hard to say it's not more likely.
1 reply
AV gives the LibDems more seats and that is likely to lead to more hung parliaments and a shifting of power from voters and manifesto to politicians and back room deals. My campaign is all about AV.
1 reply
Gosh. If that's the necessary standard I'm going to fail you too Elmer!
1 reply
Getting rid of 50p (and replacing it with another tax on wealthier people but one that is less economically damaging) is about job and wealth creation... which pays for the NHS etc.
1 reply
I talked about immigration in terms of education.
1 reply
Sorry!
1 reply
If you had closed the tags the problem would not have occurred! The guidance is here: http://conservativehome.blogs.com/torydiary/2006/01/commenting_guid.html
1 reply
Davis is not of course the only person to have fallen on Cameron's wrong side and never to have been rehabilitated. I think also of Graham Brady, Bernard Jenkin, Patrick Mercer and Mark Field. All big talents. Some forgiveness towards one or two of them would be good for party unity.
1 reply
You make an important distinction Cleethorpes but I still think the moral force of the argument can win through and the deficit-denying Mr Balls won't have much authority on the debt issue.
1 reply
Enough on Europe. Thank you. There are other topics and this thread is not about Europe!!
1 reply
Julian Bray left italics on so I've deleted his comment and re-pasted below: "Why oh why do they think unreconstructed hacks make good comms directors? Ask any PR agency chief who has hired a hack or an editor and they will tell you that a period of rehabilitation needs to be undertaken, lessons learned, before our friendly hack is let anyway near the client. David Cameron was once a PR for Carlton Televsion, can he have forgotten what it is really like out there beyond the Westminster bubble?"
1 reply