This is understudy's Typepad Profile.
Join Typepad and start following understudy's activity
understudy
Recent Activity
"We have nothing to replace the huge amount of construction and consumption demand created by the $8 trillion housing bubble"
Why Yes - it is psychological! If only we had another bubble to increase spending/"investment" towards would that $8t hole be filled. You Brad, and Krugman think more Solyndra, high speed rail to nowhere, and other rent seeking "investment" in DC lobbyists will fix that hole, a lot of other folks disagress ...
And Dean Baker Gets One Completely Right: Why Oh Why Can't We Have a Better Press Corps? Robert Samuelson of the Washington Post This Means You Weblogging
Dean Baker: Robert Samuelson's Psychological Problems: >Robert Samuelson is convinced that the U.S. economy is suffering from psychological problems. In a piece titled, "why job creation is so hard" he tells readers: "We have gone from being an expansive, risk-taking society to a skittish, risk...
It isn't that hard to understand - there was an unsustainable mortgage debt bubble in the US which boosted consumption, capital spending, government tax revenues and a host of other economic activities that was based on the fact that housing prices never decline in the US (or more specifically California in the 20th century). Trying to get us back on that growth path? Find the next bubble thing that can be loaded up with a lot of debt to support "investment" and consumption that we won't know if it works for 10 years.
Obama made a good start with the preschool plan - easy to spend billions with no results, encourage entrepreneurs to start new businesses, etc., etc. But to get back to 4% real GDP growth, we'll need another tech bubble or something ...
The Long-Run Cost of the Economic Downturn: Gloomy News About Economic Growth
I have been staring at a very gloomy graph--at the Congressional Budget Office's forecasts of "potential output", of what the economy can produce without starting to "overheat" and putting upward pressure on inflation: Looking at this graph tells me that: * Real GDP fell relative to potential ou...
But given the inability for the government to actually (absent a dot com boom) do deficit reduction at "full employment", the response is rational. Telling politicians they can spend money because it is good results in a very short term boost to rent seeking industries that sound good to politcians, hell bent on picking winners (donors) and losers (non-donors). Even if the stimulus had been 100% payroll tax deduction (which would have been more efficient and effective), there is no credibility or evidence that a modern US government will grow spending less than taxes over a 4-8 year period.
Janet Yellen Points Out That the Federal Reserve Has Had No Help in Stemming the Depression
Jared Bernstein writes: >Janet Yellen Speaks, Makes Critical Points, and Presents a Graph I Shoulda Made: I’ll have more to say about this remarkable speech given yesterday by Fed Vice Chair Janet Yellen (getting ready to go on NOW with Alex Wagner on MSNBC). Well—remarkable in the sense that ...
The call to boost homeownership was a "public good" supported by folks across a wide range of political strikes. Who doesn't support more home owners, puppies or apple pie?
Is 8% high? Yes, that is why investment in multi family homes are accelerating and I would not bet on those rates staying that high for long.
In the meantime, millions of middle class families borrowed billions of dollars from german savings banks through defunct wall street firms and aren't going to pay it back. who screwed whom?
Larry Summers: U.S. Must Do More than Focus on Deficit
I would say not "do more" but "do different": the U.S. has been focusing on the deficit since the end of 2009, and all that has gotten us has been a jobless recovery. Were we to focus on employment and growth, we would be highly likely to make more progress on reducing the future burden of the ...
"As we can see, the rate of cost increase for public four-year universities was the most rapid of all. One big reason for that, of course, is reduced state support of higher education"
You fail the expert witness test you self-interested shill for california public universities ;-)
No the bigger driver of public tuition increases at four universities is a suicidal race to the top in administrative and facility expenses justified by rankings (US Snooze) and ratings (credit agencies). Berkeley provided a better education at a cheaper cost in the past. A billion or two more from sacramento wouldn't improve either of those metrics...
Middle Class Political Economist: America Shows No Increase in College Graduation Rates over the last 30 Years
Middle Class Political Economist: America Shows No Increase in College Graduation Rates over the last 30 Years: >Jared Bernstein (via Paul Krugman) highlights an amazing breakdown in the prospects for reducing economic inequality any time soon. Over the last 30 years, the U.S. has made no progr...
" very effectively to discredit organized collective action such as that carried out under the umbrella of trade unions or governments, presenting unions and governments as obsolete bodies whose sole purpose is to restrict choices."
No, not restrict choice, but the sole reason Walmart is the poster child for so much of what is "wrong" with America is because they have taken on the oligpoly of the grocery industry, which is unionized. Unions first concern is not where you shop, but rather that their members make above market wages. Walmart has threatened that, so the unions will do whatever they can in their legal power to make you not want to Walmart, but rather some other unionized grocery chain.
This story resonates with the American left much stronger than the bigger loss of unionized jobs - Americans have ended up reducing their choice, and destroying a lot of union jobs, by stopping the use of landline phones, in favor of something call "celluar". If only people would realize that they might lose the option to make a landline or telegraph communication by switching to the newest technology everytime it comes along ...
Tom Slee: No One Makes You Shop at Wal-Mart, Chapter 1
Tom Slee: No One Makes You Shop at Wal-Mart: **The Surprising Deceptions of Individual Choice: Chapter 1 — A World Of Choice:** >We live in a world of choice. >We make choices every day. We choose the clothes we wear, the way we travel, the movies we watch, and the places we shop. From time to ti...
I read Ruffing's pape briefly, but came away with different conclusions. DI rates have gone up, substantially since 1975, completely ignoring the noise around the changes in definitions during the Reagan years. Secondly, the increase in women in the workforce makes no difference. All the DI % is based on ELIGIBLE population. When women weren't in the workforce, they weren't included as Eligible. Now they are, and they are included in both the numerator and denominator, shouldn't change the rate of DI among eligible population.
Jared Bernstein: Disability Rolls and the Makers/Takers/Fakers Nonsense
Jared Bernstein: >Disability Rolls and the Makers/Takers/Fakers Nonsense: Jimmy Pethokoukis… went on a rant about all the fakers on the Social Security Disability rolls, prompting me to inject some facts from my CBPP colleague Kathy Ruffing…. >[The] number on the DI rolls has doubled since 1995...
"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds" -
Kind of like asking democrats of their reflexive support for mandating union construction wages that benefit white males at the expense of ... well everyone else. Or when Obama was "undecided" about gay marriage in 2006, but supported it in 2012. What politcians say doesn't matter, what they do can make the difference.
Michael Gerson and Paul Ryan Lie About What Republicans Say to Each Other About the "Takers"
Taegan Goddard juxtaposes: >Paul Ryan, Now and Then: >"No one is suggesting that what we call our earned entitlements -- entitlements you pay for, like payroll taxes for Medicare and Social Security -- are putting you in a 'taker' category. No one would suggest that whatsoever." >--Rep. Paul Ry...
polemicist ... sounds right
"Second, it would devastate charitable giving" says who? and even if true, so what? Tax expenditures, tax preferences are BS, if they support rich second homes or professors with million dollar state pension and UNTAXED tuition discounts for children.
In Which I Find Cass Sunstein's Implied Author Not Very Appealing...
Cass Sunstein: >Krugman, Krauthammer and Their Implied Authors: Implied authors are the imaginary people whom authors create as they put words on a page. Implied authors have their own personalities…. Wayne Booth initially developed the idea of the implied author, which he followed with a claim t...
"Since then the costs of higher education have been rising at an extraordinarily rapid pace in the United States, as government subsidies are withdrawn, and as private colleges react to rising sticker costs of public colleges by raising their own sticker prices"
Do you really believe that? I don't. Private college tuition has risen at a faster rate than public in my state, and Stanford could care less what Berkeley charges, and private schools try to link the value of their education to the elite schools, not the state schools ...
Brad DeLong: Education as a Road to Greater Equality
[CENTER FOR LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES, UC BERKELEY: INEQUALITY: DIALOGUES FOR THE AMERICAS, FALL 2012: OCTOBER 15, 2012](http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2012/10/center-for-latin-american-studies-uc-berkeley-inequality-dialogues-for-the-americas-fall-2012.html) * [Full cleaned-up transcript](http://de...
understudy is now following The Typepad Team
Aug 30, 2012
Subscribe to understudy’s Recent Activity