This is Michelle Powell's Typepad Profile.
Join Typepad and start following Michelle Powell's activity
Join Now!
Already a member? Sign In
Michelle Powell
Shelton, CT
Mikrotik - Pros and Cons - what is the best wireless router 2017
Interests: Periodically on Habrahabr skips mention of these what is the best wireless router 2017 (mostly they are advised to q & a questions about the choice of the what is the best wireless router 2017 ). Also in runet quite a lot of resources and so dedicated to this gland. But very little information about the pros and cons of this important decision. This article I want to improve the situation somewhat. I also hope that I will add in the comments and tell something new. For starters, you can refer to Wikipedia and learn what Mikrotikls Ltd (trademark MikroTik) - Latvian manufacturer of computer networking equipment. MikroTik develops, sells and installs wired and wireless what is the best wireless router 2017 , operating systems for them and related equipment. The company was founded in 1995 with the purpose of selling in emerging markets equipment. In 2007 the company employed more than 70 employees. You can divide the iron, which is called the what is the best wireless router 2017 Board and operating system, which is called RouterOS. In colloquial speech, when they talk about it all, just say Mikrotik. Now we move on to the pros and cons. What advantages have mikrotika 1. Cost - tsennovoy in its category competitors simply it does not have. 2. Functionality - Compared with the Dlink, TP-Link, Zyxell and other "home" routers functionality is huge. Necessary to compare more with Cisco, Juniper and other "adult" iron or linux or freebsd (only network stack) systems. Enumerate not see the point, but I can see that it is possible to realize almost any "Wishlist" in network technologies. 3. Reliability and stability - if mikrotik configured and tested it will work very long and without problems. It is also very save embedded scripting language (with which you can customize all sorts of action on the problem) and WatchDog technology that saves while hovering router. All the problems which I have had, arose due to power problems (and often a lot of thunderstorms). If you have good ground and UPS are practically no problems. Although periodically on the forums and I hear about bugs and marriage, but he had never encountered (if you do not take your hands curves bug). 4. Documentation and Updates - there is quite a detailed official Wikipedia. All firmware lie directly on the site are available for download even without authorization. In contrast to the same Cisco where a simple update to get sometimes a problem (requires certified professional status or even say that it is only for the Help Desk) 5. Unified OS and system configuration - as it always used RouterOS and it allows to quickly change the equipment restores on new hardware or simply pass-advise others how and what to do. 6. Scalability - Any suggestions for virtually every segment of small and medium-sized businesses (for large I would not recommend). And if you do not have enough to suit any of the Core-series, you can always expand on the powerful RouterOS x86 server with the desired performance. And now you can go to the cons - 1. If you need to really trouble-free operation, the mikrotik you hardly suitable. But this is a completely different level of iron (multiple power supplies, redundant everything, and other pleasures of life). However, there are case studies on the RouterOS on multiple x86 servers + VMware Fault Tolerance, and the VRRP knowingly invented. 2. If you want to route traffic over 10G every second (yes there is a Core-series, but let's face it - it, too, not everything went smoothly). 3. When you need encryption GOST, or have dynamic routing on the EIGRP, or and other pleasures of Vendor Lock. 4. If you do not understand the networks - course set up on a pile of manuals of the network is not very difficult, but for the average user enough time-consuming process. 5. If you are a manufacturer of iron - assume that you put the margin at 20%. Then you are more profitable to sell the same CISCO, than Mikrotik. Since CISCO more expensive and thus bring you big profits. 6. If you need a device "all-in-one» - NAS, Torrent rocking, DLNA, coffee maker and everything else then it is unlikely you will approach Mikrotik. This is a router (although through the built virtualization and can be implemented, but it will not work very stable) * there should be a picture with a trolleybus of a loaf of bread * 7. If you are Richard Stallman or kind to the GPL. Because yes. Violate. RouterOS is based on Linux, but that was changed, and no one knows. 8. Minus the user with Habré expressed it in one of the posts - «DrDiza: put customers in the office. for a small load - the most it. postvil forgotten. The downside is that these customers will no longer call, because they all work. Toll and me less. " 9. There is no "corporate" tech support and guarantees - is not here to you for 2 hours was replaced with a new piece of metal. Or remotely configured by connecting anything. Or to understand yourself, or pay freelancers. In general support is and if you do not need "here and now", it is quite possible you will approach it. 10. The small spread of the brand - it is a significant disadvantage. And it is for consumers and professionals. Since RouterOS poorly distributed, the demand for specialists versed in it is small. And for businesses - if you have a network built on the OS, and then your system administrator is gone, you will be harder to find a specialist who would have understood the issue. And far from the big cities to find routers Mikrotik sometimes quite a big problem at this perhaps all, I welcome your comments, questions and amendments. PS: Dear habrapolzovateli if you compare iron, let's compare at least roughly comparable in price - it is not necessary to compare a piece of iron for 3000 rubles and a piece of metal for $ 3000 :)
Recent Activity
Michelle Powell is now following The Typepad Team
Dec 29, 2016