This is Scott O's Typepad Profile.
Join Typepad and start following Scott O's activity
Join Now!
Already a member? Sign In
Scott O
Recent Activity
Worst left wing slip up yet - "You don't know shit about San Francisco..." Well, actually that's the whole point, dude. The whole world knows about SF's fecal problem. Maybe this stupid sock puppet can let us in on what other city has its own app to let folks know where the heaviest concentrations of human poop piles are? Methinks the left is getting just a tad nervous about their blossoming 'progressive' nirvana.
"Pete Wilson had absymal approval ratings after he went full public with his racism." Unfortunately there seems to be no record of this. Perhaps this sock puppet could provide actual video, audio, or transcript of proof of Pete Wilson's 'racism'? Prop 187 passed with flying colors. Is that the 'evidence' of Wilson's low numbers? "Perhaps you should consider running a more moderate GOP candidate next time, in the mold of Arnold." You mean run folks calling themselves Rs but espousing Democrat talking points? What would be the point? You still wouldn't win. The Dems would still trash the state and Paul would still blame you. Why don't you fun-loving true-blue Dems all move to South Central or El Monte? Oh, that's right - heh, heh - a little toooo much 'diversity' going on there. Far better to stay and play in Whitey-white county and cast aspersions on those you don't agree with. Gotta love that white, left wing morality.
CC 11:18 - I'm hardly crying, fool - I'm just shaking my head at how pathetically cowardly you lefties are. Can't or won't answer any questions, can't posit any solutions, too ashamed to admit the person you thought might be a good candidate turned out to be a loser... Still - you throw enough rocks to possibly develop into a 3rd string pitcher for a baseball team from podunk. Have a great day!
Toggle Commented 2 days ago on Sandbox - 8nov19 at Rebane's Ruminations
fish - That new spot of excrement in SF as the new DA is really a piece of work. Check out his web site. https://www.chesaboudin.com/ Telling quote: "Chesa Boudin's parents were incarcerated when he was just fourteen months old for driving the getaway car in a robbery that tragically took the lives of three men. Chesa's father is still in prison. Chesa knows first-hand the destructive impacts of mass incarceration – he had to go through a metal detector and steel gates just to give his parents a hug. Though he was not physically injured that tragic day, he was one of the dozens of people whose lives were devastated." Apparently the 3 murdered humans were not killed by anyone. And Chesa is trying portray himself as a victim of something that just happened to occur. Then there's that darn 'mass incarceration' that caused poor lil Chesa to have to go through security just so he could give his parents a hug. And the children of the murdered men? What do they have to do to get a hug from daddy? Chesa really doesn't give a shit about them. This IS all about Chesa, isn't it? The man is sick beyond belief. His parents were willing perps in an armed robbery abetting the murder of 3 men. Chesa should never have had any more contact with either of his parents beyond putting flowers on their graves. SF - you have really done it this time.
Toggle Commented 2 days ago on Sandbox - 8nov19 at Rebane's Ruminations
CC 9:08 - ",,,Consider that a question ScottIO,,,waiting for your answers,,," Actually sparky, I had asked you a question... Instead of answering, you get stupid and come back with an idiot remark that makes no sense. You're no better than Auntie Emery. Can't any of you lefties answer questions? And we still have not one single leftie willing to name a fav candidate. What are you bed wetters waiting for? Bill Gates or Warren Buffett?
Toggle Commented 2 days ago on Sandbox - 8nov19 at Rebane's Ruminations
Walt 1:21 - You had me going for a bit, there. I did see a story at CBS about the "problems" of low unemployment. Apparently employers have to pay higher wages. I kid you not. It's a problem! Leave it to the Fake News Media to find a rain cloud in every sunny Trump day! Darn higher wages! Oh, when we be rid of this evil Trump?
BT 7:27 - If it's yours, it's too much - if it's theirs, it's just right. Any more questions?
Toggle Commented 3 days ago on Sandbox - 8nov19 at Rebane's Ruminations
BT 7:09 - Yeah, I'm remembering Obama talking about the day the sea level would not rise. How bitterly disappointed I was to find out it had risen. He promised! I'll never love again. His trousers were pressed so well!
Toggle Commented 3 days ago on Sandbox - 8nov19 at Rebane's Ruminations
Walt 6:11 - "What constitutes "rich"?" Walt - asking questions like that constitute a 'micro-aggression'. Now sit down at your desk and listen to your betters explain everything. Maybe. Never.
Toggle Commented 3 days ago on Sandbox - 8nov19 at Rebane's Ruminations
CC 6:07 -"Scotto,,,don't know what right wing talking points you are reciting but the only thing I know is that lefties want the rich to pay their fare share whatever that is. But you are abscessing a lot about rich white guys like the one you elected and love to pieces... George - hey George? Where do you find these guys? I asked this sock puppet what 'question' he wants me to answer and he comes back with this? Meanwhile - I'm "abscessing" a lot about the front runners against Trump. Like the "one" I elected and "love to pieces". You know, I've voted for quite a lot of men and women of all skin colors and political parties, so you'll have to excuse me if I claim to have confusion as to what you are talking about. I don't believe I've ever considered sex, skin color or wealth to be any kind of determining factor as to whom I vote for or whom I believe is responsible for our nation's ills. Still waiting for that "real question".
Toggle Commented 3 days ago on Sandbox - 8nov19 at Rebane's Ruminations
Walt - Funny how the left are always telling us what 'we' need and don't need. I'm pretty sure 'we' don't need two thirds of the fed govt, but there it is. How would the left like it for me to tell them what they 'need'? It shows how ignorant and lacking in awareness the left is that they have never even pondered such a question. The revealing theme is how the left dances from what we don't 'need' to what we need to make illegal. I realize all of this is political BS on the campaign trail, but has anyone in the audience asked themselves how this drivel will actually make them safer or improve their lot? Hysteria.
Toggle Commented 3 days ago on Sandbox - 8nov19 at Rebane's Ruminations
Carlos C - "...just because Hunter Biden was elected to the board of a foreign company does not make him a criminal." And who has said that makes him a criminal? Aside from the illegal drug use that washed him out of the service and continues to dog him. Witness the little 'car rental' problem. Love to see lefties defending payola to wealthy white males. I could have sworn they had 'deeply held' beliefs that this sort of thing was evil and should be stopped. Pretty soon it's a possibility that quite a few lefties will be drinking the Kool Aid and voting for another wealthy white male. And so soon after complaining that sort was the root of our country's problem. Ah, well.
Toggle Commented 3 days ago on Sandbox - 8nov19 at Rebane's Ruminations
Booby 1:37 - "Scott-- Gee Scott .. when violence occurs at what point does a rally become a riot?.. but nice try in dodging the real question. Now what do you think about the Proud Boys? Do you agree that it is a good thing to waste taxpayer dollars as they are doing. Is it a crime to cross state lines to screw taxpayers like Tarrio?" First of all - what is the 'real question'? Just ask and I'll answer. Simple as that. Actually, the Proud Boys aren't starting any violence and they aren't wasting anyone's money. If they have a rally and the Antifa show up and start violence, then I would say Antifa is the culprit. Finally - "Is it a crime to cross state lines to screw taxpayers like Tarrio?" I would think it would be a crime to screw taxpayers like Tarrio whether or not you cross a state line to do so. Don't you?
Toggle Commented 3 days ago on Sandbox - 8nov19 at Rebane's Ruminations
Boobie 8:41 - "...you should start with the decades long campaign to discredit climate change science." Ah - you mean like the prediction of the 'end of snow' from the NYTs? https://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/08/opinion/sunday/the-end-of-snow.html or Maybe Manhattan under water? https://bwi.forums.rivals.com/threads/climate-expert-james-hansen-new-york-will-have-vanished-underwater-by-midnight.196939/ And How about that famed expert Dr Mann? Got his ass handed to him by the court because he came up empty when they asked for his so-called proof. https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/08/michael_mann_creator_of_the_infamous_global_warming_hockey_stick_loses_lawsuit_against_climate_skeptic_ordered_to_pay_defendants_costs.html That's right, Boobie - your side of the argument has been waging a war against itself for decades with BS and predictions that have all been discredited. "Rain events"? I could have sworn we were supposed to have severe droughts. "The largest single rain event and hurricane on record both occurring two weeks apart." And we've been keeping records for about one billionth of the time that land there has existed. Pretty scientific. That sampling rate would earn you an F in any real science class. Best for last... "Of course, you all will come up with the usual pile of BS excuses for why climate science is wrong..." Yeah - we quote your side - pretty ingenious of us, huh? Exactly what part of 'climate science' have we said was wrong?
Toggle Commented 4 days ago on Sandbox - 8nov19 at Rebane's Ruminations
Bobbie 6:03 - The actual quote showed no equivalency. He merely said it reminded him of the sacrifices others had made - he never said it was the same sort of sacrifice. But you keep up the rock throwing - you might break a few windows yet. BTW Boobie - what or who are you for? I mean beyond hating. You might want to offer a name of some one you would want to lead us. Go ahead - we need the comedy.
Toggle Commented 5 days ago on Sandbox - 8nov19 at Rebane's Ruminations
Dougie 6:05 - Are you that clueless? You are making my point, fool. I am forgetting nothing. It seems the left has no brains. Rich people bad, bad, bad - but the left usually votes for the richest folk they can find. And the very worst of the worst is the very evil wealthy white males. Biden, Sanders and now maybe Bloomberg. The left would vote for a black, but apparently there aren't any left that are 'clean' and have their trousers pressed properly.
Toggle Commented 5 days ago on Sandbox - 8nov19 at Rebane's Ruminations
Emery 4:05 - "Same excuse despite the Dems willing virtually all partisan elections for the last four years." I'll assume you meant 'winning'. But we are told that Trump is a danger to our democracy. Yet the left keeps winning elections. Sounds like the left is full of shit. "The Repubs even lost the Governorship in Kentucky, a State Trump carried by over over 30% in '16." All the other state-wide offices in Kentucky were won by Rs, Paul. But Paul never digs beyond the headlines the lefty-press feeds him. But welcome back, Paul. You must have quite a sackful of rocks stored up by now.
Toggle Commented 5 days ago on Sandbox - 8nov19 at Rebane's Ruminations
Dougie 2:16 - You're as stupid as Bug-Gums. It's the left and the Dems that carp about those terrible, awful, wealthy, white males screwing everything up. Yet once again we see another wealthy white male come to the fore as the left's possible choice. Maybe Dougie can come up with a champion? You lefties are the most cowardly bunch of pantywaists I've ever come across. You stand for absolutely nothing beyond what you can grab from some one else's wallet.
Toggle Commented 5 days ago on Sandbox - 8nov19 at Rebane's Ruminations
Bug-gums 9:58 - Uh, dude - you seem to be completely unclear on reality. The R's don't put restrictions on skin color, sex or wealth as to who they want to vote for. You might notice if you would pay attention that the Dems are always carrying on about how bad those wealthy, white males are and yet it seems they keep voting for them. Trump's wealth and skin color didn't mean anything to me when it came time to chose a new pres. The only possibly viable woman Dem at this point is Fauxcahauntus and she seems bent on destroying her own chances right now.
Toggle Commented 6 days ago on Sandbox - 8nov19 at Rebane's Ruminations
The left just loves them wealthy, white males! Maybe run AOC as veep for "balance"? Where, oh where are our brave lefties that love to show up here? Who's their champion? What are they for? Other than scavenging for rocks to throw. At least Ben ventured out on a limb a bit and offered his solution of 'bioregionalism'. I'll have to look that one up.
Toggle Commented 6 days ago on Sandbox - 8nov19 at Rebane's Ruminations
BT - "While income inequality is a problem and should not be dismissed out of hand nor swept under the carpet, the solutions being put forth are worse than the problems." Agreed. Folks talk about automation relegating humans to the sidelines, but the growing number of humans that don't have jobs are mostly unemployable due to physical or mental disabilities, and or a general attitude of not wanting to be useful to society. Along with this group, there are the ones working but never at any kind of skilled position and always in danger of falling into inescapable debt and poverty. The left offers a solution of various fabricated 'rights' of free material wealth they are due from the govt. It doesn't matter what kind of govt system or 'ism' you wish to have implementing those 'rights' - it will always end up badly. No one on earth has any sort of right to any material goods. We do however, have an obligation to care for everyone and see to it that they are treated humanely. Part of that humane treatment is to make sure that everyone at least tries to find a way to contribute back to society. My wife and I raised our children to have a desire to earn any and all material wealth. Why would I want any other child raised differently? The left wants humans raised to be either a member of the elite ruling class, exempt from the rules the rest of society have to follow or be part of the lower prole class - with a lifestyle of animals in a very deluxe zoo. The way forward will be difficult as there is no general consensus as to which of the 2 highly divergent views will prevail.
If you really want to dig into 'male supremacy' and 'white supremacy' you have to start eons ago and make a note of why any humans alive today have the intelligence and physical capabilities that we have. There was competition and struggle. There was 'inequality'. It was a matter of who had food and who didn't. Horrors! In those days, it was the quick and the dead. And the dead tended to not pass along any genetic material. If you wish to be apologetic about inequality, then start apologizing to the lower classes of the animal kingdom. Every human alive today has abilities and intelligence that outstrip any other living creature on earth. And they didn't get that way because of govt programs to make everything fair and equal. Capitalism has been the major player in helping more people than ever live lives more equal than before. Do away with it at your peril.
BT 7:45 - You're not lost. It's poor Ben and his fellow travelers. Look at his misery. "Bioregionalism is the answer for human survival along with millions upon millions of other species trying to live on Earth." In order for any human to live - millions of creatures trying to "live" must die every day. If you don't believe this, I would suggest a trip to the hospital where someone is dying of sepsis. Of course I'm talking about the 'yucky' critters that seem to have less value than the furry little 'cute' creatures. Humans happily hunted all sorts of creatures into extinction long before capitalism. Why capitalism is the source of animal extinction is lost on me. Ben should probably hie himself to those countries where most of the endangered critters are being hunted into zero population and explain his theories to them. But of course he won't. Too many non-whites live there. And they aren't about to listen to his ignorant yap.
Whatever it is that Ben suffers from, it's clear that the disease seems to affect his ability to reason. Or maybe Ben is ignorant of world history. "Inequality" was far, far worse just a hundred years ago and even far worse than that for most of recorded history. And capitalism didn't even exist for 99% of the time period I'm talking about. Capitalism (coupled with a free market and liberty) has done more for the masses than any other system. Ever. It's not even close. The poorest humans in this country live a life of ease and luxury. Is there 'inequality'? Of course there is. Some are smarter and have better discipline and upbringings. And they tend to congregate and marry with others of the same ilk. And their children are brought up in an atmosphere of hard work, real education, and a sense of duty to society. Ta Da! They prosper. Look - some folks go home after work and crack a few beers and watch the tube. Others go to the gym and work out and watch their diets. Is it unfair that those who actively work towards good health are in better health than the sluggards? We do not await any sort of educated answer from the left.
Paul 6:34 Yeah, Paul - California voted for Brown back in the 70's because they knew Trump was going to be the pres in the future. Maybe we could have a welfare check on Paul - he is truly around the bend. The TDS has completely overtaken his brain and possibly his spleen and some other small organs as well.