This is TartanSeer's Typepad Profile.
Join Typepad and start following TartanSeer's activity
TartanSeer
Recent Activity
Yet another reason why we need a fully sovereign Scottish government that has the power to remove these WMD from Scottish soil.
Revealed: the 22 safety shortfalls of Scotland’s nuclear crane
from Sunday Herald, 03 April 2011 A massive crane that lifts fully armed nuclear submarines out of the water at the Faslane naval base on the Clyde has 22 safety “shortfalls” and could suffer a nuclear disaster, according to a secret Ministry of Defence (MoD) report. The submarine shiplift,...
Typical Lib Dem, given a chance to really represent his country and make a difference ends up doing Westminster's bidding, be it the stillborn Calman proposals or the chance to repatriate the Crown Estates to Scotland - as Highland Lib Dem's have promised for years.
Moore was only given the Scot Sec job because they had to find a Liberal to make up the numbers if the Tory coalition was to fly. As we have seen Moore has been promoted well above his natural pay grade and will be a prime candidate for the chop once the proverbial hits the fan.
Silent as the stones: What Michael Moore MP (didn't) have to say on Scottish jobs, fuel costs and future
There's a great piece on today's leader page of The Sunday Mail revealing that the Scottish Secretary Michael Moore had absolutely nothing to contribute to last week's Joint Ministerial Committee meeting to discuss the economic crisis. You will remember that this was the meeting which resulted...
Shirley-Anne has earned her spurs with the Edinburgh trams fiasco. Give her the job Alex.
Stevenson's departure offers opportunity for women
It's better for the government that Stewart Stevenson has resigned, even if a lot of people out there - including me - thought it ridiculous to blame one man for the weather. The resignation letter said he had gone because of the failure to communicate with motorists, but we all know he's really...
The phoney war is over, time for all who have Scotland's best interests at heart to come together and make the case for full self government.
Time to do ....
Salmond on the referendum question
The First Minister has issued a statement clarifying this morning's report on the referendum, which was the subject of my previous blog post. Thanks to all who commented here and on facebook - please continue to express your views. Here is what the First Minister said: "In the next few days th...
Yousuf, Labour had years to deliver fiscal autonomy but had no intention of touching anything that smacked of 'autonomy'. Hence the stillborn Calman proposals.
As far as cuts are concerned, I didn't hear a cheep from you when it was the Labour party both slashing the Scot Gov's budget & promising to make cuts that were 'deeper and tougher' than Margaret Thatcher's attack on Scotland.
I suspect that if Labour had won the election & Darling had got his way you would be busy defending Labour cuts under the banner 'There Is No Alternative'.
You're wrong Yousuf
Feeling wilted? Try fiscal responsibility Many happy returns to Yousuf Hamid, 21 yesterday and already one of Scotland's blogging veterans. I have met Yousuf a few times and he was kind enough to invite me to speak at a debate he was organising in Strathclyde University. A very nice chap, f...
Delighted for you on a personal level Joan, but The Scotsman has become little more than a Labour mouthpiece, a disgrace to a paper that still has pretensions regarding its status as a national newspaper of record.
Along with thousands of other folk I haven't bought the paper for years & will not be going back so long as the Scotsman continues on its present path.
New column in The Scotsman today
New column starts today in The Scotsman. If you want to read it you need to subscribe or buy the paper. Rather chuffed with the good show. It is the main illustrated column. If I say so myself, Peter MacMahon is creating impressive comment pages. They engage readers with what is happening in the...
I am more than happy to be corrected, but are these issues not 'reserved matters'?
Who owns Scotland's seabed?
Scotland will never be the Saudi Arabia of marine energy while seabed rent goes south. So says Andy Wightman, the author of Who Owns Scotland? Andy has a letter in today's Herald about the 10 wave and tidal energy projects announced this week. Scotland is said to have about a quarter of Europ...
Regarding Ms Millar's informative prog, the elephant in the room was Independence, or rather the lack of it.
North Sea Oil was talked up as a Scottish industry that 'led the world' but not a cheep on the billions lost to Scotland as oil flowed South.
And little to inform the casual viewer that the great renewables opportunity facing Scotland is worryingly dependent on the policy priorities of the Westminster govt - tax, capital investment, international cross border initiatives & so on.
However, it is up to our national government to make the case again & again, & as posted earlier, this needs to be rapidly improved.
I notice that Glen Campbell is hosting a debate tonight on BBC on 'Scotland's Green Feature' - perhaps this time we will get a serious debate rather than the usual X Factor guff that is our usual grim fare.
What Salmond should tell Copenhagen: We have the technological power to harness the waves - but need the political power to make it happen quicker
Those who say Alex Salmond should not attend the world climate change summit in Copenhagen demonstrate a depressing lack of ambition for Scotland. Yes, energy is in most respects reserved to Westminster. And yes, only Westminster can negotiate on Scotland's behalf in Denmark. But inste...
The Scottish government's push for renewables - and the massive potential that exists for Scotland to corner a large part of the global market in associated investment & jobs - is a perfect example of why we need to return sovereignty to this country.
Personally, I would like to see the FM making a good deal more of this & ratcheting up the rhetoric on the north sea inter-connector as a crucial national interest threatened by England's prerogative.
As Queen Bess said, "Prerogative is the choicest flower in my garden" - time that this C17th English monarch's prerogative, vital for a country then as now, was repatriated to Scotland's parliament.
By the way, in the light of Glen Campbell's disgrace to BBC journalism on Newsnight Scotland last night
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/8414797.stm
isn't it an insult to the office of the FM and, by extension, the people of this country, that BBC Scotland (sic) ignored Scotland's input to the Copenhagen Conference, a vital international gathering and the first that Scotland has attended in her own right, albeit at sub-State level?
No doubt Pacific Quay were under instruction to keep things reassuringly parochial.
What Salmond should tell Copenhagen: We have the technological power to harness the waves - but need the political power to make it happen quicker
Those who say Alex Salmond should not attend the world climate change summit in Copenhagen demonstrate a depressing lack of ambition for Scotland. Yes, energy is in most respects reserved to Westminster. And yes, only Westminster can negotiate on Scotland's behalf in Denmark. But inste...
Two brief points by way of reply:
Nobody is arguing for the retention of Trident - certainly not Jim Sillars or myself for that matter. Nobody is preventing anti-Trident voters from walking towars us on this issue. But in truth the removal of Trident will not be overnight, giving the SNP a powerful bargaining tool both before & after a successful plebiscite. We should milk it for all it is worth.
With regard to NATO we have to live in the world as it is, not in the world we would like it to be.
We know that come the referendum there will be a cacophony of voices warning of the 'dangers' of 'splitting' from our 'allies' in a 'uncertain' world - so why adopt a naive macho 'bring it on' position that can only damage our prospects? Particularly as this can only be sorted one way or the other AFTER independence, by whichever Party/Parties form the government of Scotland.
Bottom line, a anti-NATO line will harm the SNP's prospects which is why we need to ditch this sacred cow.
Sillars challenges the SNP to drop opposition to NATO and Trident
The Scotsman report details today of a new pamphlet by former SNP Deputy leader Jim Sillars which says the party should ditch a few key policies in order to build a consensus for independence. I admire Jim Sillars as a person and a politician and his views are always original and well thought o...
At just over what ought to be the half way point of the SNP government, Jim Sillars characteristically trenchant views on the way forward for the independence movement are to be warmly welcomed.
Sillars is right to argue that to win an independence referendum will require the SNP to reach out beyond its own support base & fashion a coalition from all political parties – and none.
Indeed, the SNP is doing just that, but much remains to be done in presenting a compelling vision of an independent Scotland, of the difference that independence will make to the ordinary person in the street, both on a personal level and with regard to the nation as a whole.
All too often, when canvassing members of the public as to their position on an independence referendum, the reply is “I don’t know”. And that can include SNP voters!
The SNP government needs to hammer home relentlessly both the positives – what CAN and ought to be done with full sovereign powers – and negatives – the measures the SNP government wish to take for the benefit of Scotland but are prevented from carrying out thanks to the Westminster prerogative.
With this in mind, I think Jim Sillars hits the nail on the head where he highlights the necessity for Scots – and the Scottish government – to think in terms of ‘Scottish State Interests’. By this Sillars means painting in black and white the vital interests of Scottish state interests, contrasted to the priorities of what in reality is the English State. Take the Scottish equation out of the ‘British’ State, and you are left with a predominantly English one. A State increasingly at odds with the national Scottish interest – borrowing, taxation (Sillars flags up the national imperative to utilise a radical tax regime to grow Scottish small & medium sized businesses & thereby tackle economic under-performance), public investment, international representation (e.g. Copenhagen), the list goes on. Time to stop looking to the Unionist past, time to envisage Scotland as one more independent State amongst many.
Sillars goes on to chart Britain, England’s, decline, and to strangle the notion that the ‘big’ UK is a strength, exacerbating Scotland’s social and economic problems – all music to the nationalist ear, but not a note that has been played by the SNP for many long years.
It strikes me that such a narrative would be an ideal vehicle for explaining why independence is Scotland’s future, why increased powers are vital and give people a clear vision of what Scotland can be compared to the tired and reactionary offerings of the Unionist parties.
Predictably, the Unionist press, led by The Hootsmon, has picked up on Sillars views on the EU and NATO. Take away all the froth and twaddle however and there are some interesting points worthy of consideration.
On Europe Sillars favours Scotland joining EFTA/EEA rather than the EU, on the basis that EFTA/EEA would enable Scotland to keep more of the sovereignty required to repair the damage left over from the bust UK. Personally, I do not buy it. Whilst there is a superficial attraction in winning over the Euro-sceptic vote and dumping the Common Fisheries Policy, having all the benefits of free European trade but with none of the shared EU obligations smacks of wanting to have your cake and eating it. If Jim Sillars position was as sagacious as he would have us believe, there would have been a stampede of the EU’s newest States into EFTA, rather than present reality where it looks like Iceland will be dumping EFTA, leaving a rump consisting of Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland.
And I cannot but help thinking Edinburgh’s competition in Frankfurt would be rubbing their hands in glee.
No matter how it is viewed, EFTA countries are dependent on decisions taken without their input. On paper they may still be able to negotiate adaption’s to EU regulations but as a small 3 nation grouping ultimately if EU was so minded EFTA would trot along obligingly. Rather than this chimera Scotland’s best interests would be best served inside EU – and that’s even before the pound sterling is jacked in for the Euro.
Jim Sillars is on much stronger ground with NATO. Whilst recognising that NATO is a totemic issue for many in the SNP, I have been arguing for years that this is the national movement’s one Achilles Heel. As Sillars points out, Scottish independence will not occur in a vacuum, with consequences for the US & European security that could blow the independence campaign out of the water if we allow it to. If present policy undermines the objective of a successful independence plebiscite it is incumbent upon the SNP to ditch it.
At a time of change and flux it is vital that the SNP offers stability and trust, which will be severely compromised if NATO/England is dredging up dark images of isolation & terrorist threat. Indeed, being in NATO shoots the UK/English separatist hare whilst increasing our leverage as a new State awaiting recognition.
The same goes for Faslane – the sub’s and infrastructure will not be able to be moved South for some time, an opportunity to utilise this bargaining chip (Sillars is calling for a formal leasing agreement) to smooth relations with the international community (and England) BEFORE THE REFERENDUM, increasing the SNP governments credibility & putting the whole defence issue onto the front foot for the SNP. Diplomatic contacts require to be made now – if the devolved Scottish government acts like a sovereign government, it bolsters its own position, reassures our neighbours and will increasingly be seen by the world as sovereign.
Sillars challenges the SNP to drop opposition to NATO and Trident
The Scotsman report details today of a new pamphlet by former SNP Deputy leader Jim Sillars which says the party should ditch a few key policies in order to build a consensus for independence. I admire Jim Sillars as a person and a politician and his views are always original and well thought o...
TartanSeer is now following The Typepad Team
Nov 22, 2009
Subscribe to TartanSeer’s Recent Activity