This is Gernot Wagner's Typepad Profile.
Join Typepad and start following Gernot Wagner's activity
Gernot Wagner
Economist at the Environmental Defense Fund in New York.
Recent Activity
You guys are too much. Thanks for the plug.
Hey, do I still have blogging privileges on your site? How about an interview with my publicist, that I write myself?
Preemptive strike
Gernot Wagner: From today’s NPR’s Leonard Lopate Show: Gernot Wagner, economist at the Environmental Defense Fund explains why the things individuals do—buying local produce, eating less meat, bringing reusable bags to the grocery store—won’t end up making much of a difference in halting globa...
The long and the short of energy efficiency
Posted Dec 20, 2010 at Environmental Economics
Comment
2
Art Carden has a great piece on the Grinch saving Christmas,
using Pigouvian taxes and the bargaining business.
But it reminds us again that even Coase missed the mark,
when it comes to things outside of Whoville's small arc.
So to Art's welcome take on a Yuletide tradition,
We humbly append a climate-change addition:
Since Whoville Whos’ chanting affects only the Grinch,
Bargaining is the solution that works in a pinch.
Climate's a problem that affects the whole planet,
Coasian bargaining is much too small to span it.
A price on carbon is the better path,
all we need now is the political math.
Failing that, to be sure, we have the EPA,
not a first-best choice, still it may win the day.
To save the world's Whovilles, we need a solution
that in the end puts a firm limit on carbon pollution.
Cap and trade is the most certain way
to give every Who joy on this and future Christmas Days.
Was Pigou a Grinch?
Hat tip to Gernot Wagner who has a read-worthy environmental extension at Market Forces: Every Who down in Whoville liked Christmas a lot. But the Grinch, who lived just north of Whoville, DID NOT. He stood and he hated the Whos and their noise He hated the shrieks of the Who girls and boys For...
The real question is whether we will run out of atmosphere before we run out of oil, coal, and gas. The evidence on that is clear. And the solution is, too. To quote one Tim Haab: "But there WILL be alternatives, forced by higher prices--and no other mechanism is that powerful."
'Peak Coaler' just doesn't have the same ring, but I bet it raises the same vitriol toward stupid economists
Time for some snark: When will production of oil and coal peak? Better question: Who cares? Betterer question: When will oil and coal run out? Even betterer question: When will oil and coal reserves be depleted to the point that prices adjust to make investments in renewables make economic ...
WH, thanks for your note. No, the planet most certainly didn't notice CCX.
The emissions reductions that did occur were puny compared to what's necessary to make a difference. That's the point: volunteerism won't do for this one. It's a rounding error at best, counterproductive at worst.
Market Forces >> Good riddance CCX
Yes, I'm afraid it is a hostage pic, John. Thanks for the plug. This just in over at Market Forces: The Chicago Climate Exchange, one of the first voluntary cap-and-trade programs, is shutting down next month. That's bad news for the planet, isn't it? Just take a look at today's Wall Street Jou...
Market Forces >> Good riddance CCX
CCX folds. The WSJ rejoices. What's in it for the planet? Continue reading
Posted Nov 20, 2010 at Environmental Economics
Comment
3
The case for strong climate policy is simple. A cap on carbon pollution is, too.
Edward L. Glaeser makes the case for simplicity in addressing climate change. I couldn’t agree more with his premise. The basic economics are indeed simple. Climate change might be the largest market failure the world has ever seen. To correct it, put the right incentives in place: correct the fact... Continue reading
Posted May 21, 2010 at Environmental Economics
Comment
7
Subscribe to Gernot Wagner’s Recent Activity