Lora, The State of South Dakota could reclaim handling the resettlement program, which would remove the administration of it from LSS & properly return it to the State to handle. That would give us more control right away while we could still join the Tennessee law suit. Reference: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/orr/resource/wilson-fish-alternative-program-guidelines which says in part: C. Procedure for a WF Program to Revert to a State-Administered RCA or PPP Model Once a WF program has been established in a state that has withdrawn from the refugee program, and absent any statutory or regulatory requirement for a WF program to revert to a state-administered RCA or PPP model upon request by the State, it is ORR’s policy that the following requirements be met for ORR to support the State’s request: The State and the current WF agency (and collaborative partners if applicable) come to an agreement that facilitates the transition from a WF to a state-administered or PPP model (or) The State provides justification that the change is in the best interest of the ORR-eligible clients, with a plan ensuring that services to ORR-eligible clients will continue uninterrupted and be coordinated with all of the resettlement agencies, (and) The State provides justification that the change is cost effective, and ORR concludes it is in the best interest of the federal government to effectuate a change.

There are many other bible verses that say if the alien or stranger wants to live with the community/country of believers they must follow the laws, rules & customs of culture. Essentially the assimilation rule. Examples: Numbers 15: The community is to have the same rules for you and for the foreigner residing among you; this is a lasting ordinance for the generations to come. You and the foreigner shall be the same before the Lord: 16 The same laws and regulations will apply both to you and to the foreigner residing among you.’” ... Exodus 20:10 but the seventh day is a sabbath to the Lord your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your male or female servant, nor your animals, nor any foreigner residing in your towns. Exodus 12:19...for whoever eats what is leavened, that person shall be cut off from the congregation of Israel, whether he is an alien or a native of the land. Exodus 12:48 “A foreigner residing among you who wants to celebrate the Lord’s Passover must have all the males in his household circumcised; then he may take part like one born in the land. There are many more, but you get the concept.

Forget about all the ad hominem labeling. Bottom line: This is about Islam and Sharia Law. 1. The article in the link below explains what Sharia law allows. We have a lesser form of Sharia law ALREADY effectively implemented in South Dakota. 2. Sharia law is derived from the Quran, the Sira (life of Mohammad) and the Hadith (the traditions & sayings of Mohammad). 3. Sharia law prohibits ANY criticism of Islam. 4. IMHO, we have effective Sharia in South Dakota via the South Dakota Voices for Peace & Justice (@sdv4justice) (Taneeza Islam is their Exec. Dir.). Just last fall this organization got two separate free speech events (3 speakers total) shut down by pressuring the host of the event. They are also very active at the SD Legislature shutting down any questioning of Islam or immigration policy. 5. It appears that the members of the Interfaith Group are (unwitting?) pawns being used by @sdj4justice to prevent criticism of Islam. 6. IMHO, it's apparent that the SD ACLU and the Argus Leader are willing accomplices of @sdv4justice in shutting down free speech by labeling anything that even quotes the Islamic texts as "hate." 7. How can it be hate when you are using the actual texts from the Quran, Sira & Hadith? 8. It's not hate - they just don't want you to know what Islamic doctrine actually says. http://bit.ly/2CAAR6d

CAIR is Hamas - see the link below: https://www.understandingthethreat.com/cair-is-hamas-2/ BTW if you follow #sdleg on Twitter it becomes abundantly clear that the Argus Leader & the SD ACLU are very close to Taneeza Islam. Both entities seem to just parrot whatever Taneeza says & are obviously supportive of her.

Steve, Both organizations/websites still exist. Taneez Islam just added on to the original SouthDakotaVoicesForPeace.org with SouthDakotaVoicesForJustice.org Your point is well taken though - Social Justice Warrior & stealth Islam is the real agenda. This article states that Taneeza Islam is the Exec. Director of both organizations: http://www.sdvfpeace.org/interfaithday It says she is "The Executive Director for South Dakota Voices for Peace and Justice.

Could the Interfaith group end up like the Qurayza Jews Steve mentions above who cooperated with Islam & yet were murdered right after the Islamists took control? "Consider the example of the Qurayza Jews... Their leader opted to stay neutral when their town was besieged by a Meccan army that was sent to take revenge for Muhammad's deadly caravan raids. The tribe killed no one from either side and even surrendered peacefully to Muhammad after the Meccans had been turned back. Yet the prophet of Islam had every male member of the Qurayza beheaded, and every woman and child enslaved, even raping one of the captives himself." Is the Interfaith Group surrendering peacefully to Islam & Sharia? First to go?

So you are saying that just pointing out the ACTUAL FACTS of what the CAIR, ISNA, the Interfaith Groups, et. al. are doing, it's Fitnah & they can harm or kill you? Would that be true of just quoting the Quran, Sunnah & Hadith?

"Holy S.D. Stealth Islam," BatSibby. Great research & summary of what's really happening! So the connections go something like this? -Muslim Brotherhood to -Hamas to -CAIR to -Taneeza Islam, SD Voices for Peace & Interfaith Group to -Dr. Dave Kapaska/Sioux Falls Chamber of Commerce to -Effective Sharia control over S.F legislators to -Shut down of free speech events & any criticism of Islam whatsoever.

Interfaith = Infiltrate. So whenever your see, read or hear "Interfaith" remember it is really "Infiltrate" i.e., Islam infiltration. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/oct/17/christian-goodwill-was-exploited-to-globalize-amer/ https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/260271/isnas-interfaith-overreach-marilyn-stern They do it in stages: https://civilusdefendus.wordpress.com/2010/01/10/4-stages-of-islamic-conquest/

Steve's clarion call must be heeded if we want to retain our respective Republics of the U.S. & the State of S.D. The last 3 months have really awakened me to the stealth Islamization going on right here in S.D., e.g., 1. About three months ago two free speech events scheduled about a week apart in Sioux Falls were cancelled because of pressure from the SouthDakotaVoicesForPeace.org Taneeza Islam is their Exec. Director. 2. The entire Jan. 10, 2018 encounter Sen. Neal Tapio had with the Interfaith group at the Capitol. Taneeza Islam was again involved. 3. I searched the internet & ascertained immediately that these Interfaith groups/communities are initiated by Islam members to shut down free speech that criticizes Islam at all. They utilize useful pawns from other faiths to help shut down any discussion about the facts of the Islamic faith. #SDleg

Then there is this going on in N.J. (which they will probably claim as a fitnah if not allowed in SD): https://leohohmann.com/2018/01/25/new-jersey-middle-school-instructs-students-islam-is-the-true-faith/

Just quoting the actual texts of the Quran, Sunnah and Hadith (Mohammed's sayings) will get you labeled an Islamophobe. But how can you be a phobe if you are just quoting their actual teachings, i.e., just stating the truth. That obviously is not fear of Muslims. It's just education. A much better & more accurate term would be and IslamCiter (or perhaps IslamQuoter). Dr.Carl Goldberg and Dr. Bill Warner are simply IslamCiters, but are thoroughly marginalized as Islamophobes. That does not stop them from quoting the teachings of Islam, nor should it stop us. It should encourage us to promulgate it all the more.

What I do not understand is how Argus Leader reporter Dana Ferguson & Libby Skarin of the S.D. ACLU so blindly go along with whatever the Interfaith Group, Taneeza Islam and SouthDakotaVoicesForPeace.org says. Just go to Twitter & search using #SDleg & read what Dana and Libby (or Libby via the SDACLU account) say. Why don't Dana & Libby explore the shut down of free speech by these three speakers just 3 mos ago? Oh wait, Dana did report on it as a good thing & quoted Taneeza in so doing: http://www.argusleader.com/story/news/politics/2017/10/26/sioux-falls-history-club-says-wont-host-anti-islam-speaker/803580001/

Taneeza got another event cancelled about a week after Branstner's & bragged about it. The link below explains: https://www.bombthrowers.com/article/cair-shutting-down-free-speech/