This is MikeWebkist's Typepad Profile.
Join Typepad and start following MikeWebkist's activity
MikeWebkist
Recent Activity
I'm trying to get my head around the apparent conflict between this and the LL article. The best I can come up with is that they are talking about two different things. Obviously the rear card in the left-hand image is sharper. But is there actually more information there? Our eyes read it as sharper, but if there's no more information, then it's doesn't actually gain anything, even if we consider it "in focus".
Commented Jun 23, 2009 on Depth of Field Hell—The Sequel at The Online Photographer
Depth of Field Hell—The Sequel
By Ctein I don't know why this myth about the depth of field being utterly independent of focal length (for constant magnification) keeps on going, because it's easy to prove that it's wrong and sometimes it really matters that it's wrong. Nonetheless, it is a myth and it is wrong. Here's the re...
Subscribe to MikeWebkist’s Recent Activity