Isn't it kind of like walking in the same foot prints of an art thief, when Art experts of artist foundations knows for certain that a work of art had been done by the artist they represent? Isn't this a crime similar to the crime as thieves stealing works of art off museum wall away from public view? Let's say many original works of art today by different artists around this world are being refused to be acknowledge as being originals from known artists of these foundations. The art experts of these artists foundations refused to look at or even discuss these works of art with their owners. Their automatic"NO" is in fact their number one rule and this is without looking at these works of art. The art experts of these artists foundations also believe they have the computers under their control and right now it seems as though they do.. These very same art experts wouldn't consider releasing any news as to the possibility of a work of art that is considered by others to be by the artist that they represent. This is pretty much all ready to come to a head like one big boil. It is known by the French art police and and released to all supposed art experts around the world that about 50% of all art now in captivity are considered to be fakes by most art law enforcement experts in France. Cheers! Bob Miller--- vanrijngo

I wonder myself how many will actually spend the time to read this important article on Vincent's sunflowers in full and fully understand what is written?

I have no idea what their regulations are for the MFA world and all of it supposed fine art experts and their phony ass copied works of art. Even if they are Vincent's works of art, these experts at the artist Foundations can't tell you shit,... mainly because they can't see shit, and have no idea what Vincent had really done. This is just my point of view and they stink,.. I mean think it is pretty shitty. vanrijngo