This is Wtpayne's Typepad Profile.
Join Typepad and start following Wtpayne's activity
Wtpayne
Recent Activity
I thought the idea was not to encourage defeatism in the presence of difficult-to-predict events, but rather to structure the way that we go about things to mitigate the impact when they do occur. In other words, to be humble about our ability to predict the future, to make sure that we have fall-back positions available when things inevitably go wrong, and to organize ourselves so that we can move quickly and adapt to changes when they occur.
When we have to predict the future, we should do it to the best of our ability, using the most sophisticated techniques at our disposal, but we should not act surprised on those inevitable occasions when we fail.
Another thing regarding Gaussian distributions:- The Central Limit theorem only gets us so far. Normality, in the datasets that I have worked with, is the exception rather than the rule.
Black Swan, White Swan, they are all Swans, you just have to look for them
Jurgen Appelo's post on Black Swans, Broken Windows, and Magicians, brings up an important point in the discussion of technical and programmatic risk. Technical and programmatic risk are amenable to mathematical models. These models are well developed ranging from Monte Carlo Simulation to Bayes...
I really, really, really like that aphorism.
Black Swans, Broken Windows, and Magicians
Magicians can make many things disappear. But not broken windows or black swans. When I was young I was fascinated by magicians. With a bit of waving of their hands they could make people disappear, shrunk in half, or turned into pigeons. I still sometimes wish I could do that. But the only thin...
To "have the courage to act on your knowledge, but also to have the humility to doubt what we know" might seem like it requires us to be hypocrites. I have felt this a few times before, occasionally concluding that hypocrisy is a necessity, or we at least must permit a certain level of transience and inconsistency in our beliefs in order that we may more effectively deal with a complex and changing world.
This is supported, to an extent, by the failures of the strong AI community to build coherent, atomic and unified databases of propositions that are broadly applicable to the world as a whole, and the relative successes of smaller domain-specific "micro models".
Similarly, the broader applicability of "Agile" (or responsive) software development methods vs strictly-planned/predictive methods speaks a similar message to the ability of static models to deal with a changing, dynamic world.
In any case, this phrase "Strong Opinions, Weakly Held" comes at the issue from a different, and very exciting angle; and is an idea that is well worth talking about.
Strong Opinions, Weakly Held
I’ve been pretty obsessed about the difference between smart people and wise people for years. I tried to write a book called “The Attitude of Wisdom” a couple times. And the virtues of wise people – those who have the courage to act on their knowledge, but the humility to doubt what they know –...
Wtpayne added a favorite at Bob Sutton
Jun 24, 2012
Wtpayne is now following The Typepad Team
Jun 24, 2012
Subscribe to Wtpayne’s Recent Activity